还没有登录哦!

[Reading Comprehension]

试题详情

文章:

    Some historians contend that conditions in the United States during the Second World War gave rise to a dynamic wartime alliance between trade unions and the African American community, an alliance that advanced the cause of civil rights. They conclude that the postwar demise of this vital alliance constituted a lost opportunity for the civil rights movement that followed the war. Other scholars, however, have portrayed organized labor as defending all along the relatively privileged position of White workers relative to African American workers. Clearly, these two perspectives are not easily reconcilable, but the historical reality is not reducible to one or the other. Unions faced a choice between either maintaining the prewar status quo or promoting a more inclusive approach that sought for all members the right to participate in the internal affairs of unions, access to skilled and high-paying positions within the occupational hierarchy, and protection against management's arbitrary authority in the workplace. While union representatives often voiced this inclusive ideal, in practice unions far more often favored entrenched interests. The accelerating development of the civil rights movement following the Second World War exacerbated the unions' dilemma, forcing trade unionists to confront contradictions in their own practices.

题目:

The passage is primarily concerned with

选项:

A、providing a context within which to evaluate opposing viewpoints about a historical phenomenon
B、identifying a flawed assumption underlying one interpretation of a historical phenomenon
C、assessing the merits and weaknesses of a controversial theory about a historical phenomenon
D、discussing the historical importance of the development of a wartime alliance
E、evaluating evidence used to support a particular interpretation of a historical phenomenon

答案:

A

提问:

请问张慧雯老师,这道题为什么不可以把E选项中的a particular interpretation理解为作者观点的那句话:两种论据无法轻易调和,历史现象不能轻易简化成一种解释。我选E的时候想的是第二段支持了观点,第一段前面引出了观点,所以总体来讲支持了E选项。

解答:

点赞1
阅读3807
解答: 张慧雯

提问:

请问张慧雯老师,这道题为什么不可以把E选项中的a particular interpretation理解为作者观点的那句话:两种论据无法轻易调和,历史现象不能轻易简化成一种解释。我选E的时候想的是第二段支持了观点,第一段前面引出了观点,所以总体来讲支持了E选项。

解答:

点赞1
阅读3808
解答: 张慧雯老师

提问:

不理解为什么选A,文章中没有分析反对观点吧。第一段说了两种相对的观点,第二段又说工会要不要维持现状,感觉重点不是分析反对观点。

解答:

点赞1
阅读5390
解答: 张慧雯老师

提问:

如果纯粹通过对比选项能否判断出来A的范围比E大呢?或者说选A不选E的原因如何通过只看选项来得出?

解答:

点赞1
阅读5386
解答: 王文静老师

提问:

第一段是在讲两个对立观点,可是第二段是在讲union,A会不会以偏概全了?

解答:

点赞0
阅读5387
解答: sysadmin老师

提问:

A怎么比E更好

解答:

点赞0
阅读5378
解答: sysadmin老师

提问:

读了文章,觉得文章说的是对一个历史现象的好与坏,感觉A,B, E 都有这层意思,不知这类题如何做

解答:

点赞0
阅读5387
解答: sysadmin老师

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询