还没有登录哦!

[Critical Reasoning]

试题详情

题目:

In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in Verland used wooden sleds with runners and steering bars.  Ten years ago, smooth plastic sleds became popular; they go faster than wooden sleds but are harder to steer and slow.  The concern that plastic sleds are more dangerous is clearly borne out by the fact that the number of children injured while sledding was much higher last winter than it was ten years ago.
 
Which of the following, if true in Verland, most seriously undermines the force of the evidence cited?

选项:

A、A few children still use traditional wooden sleds.
B、Very few children wear any kind of protective gear, such as helmets, while sledding.
C、Plastic sleds can be used in a much wider variety of snow conditions than wooden sleds can.
D、Most sledding injuries occur when a sled collides with a tree, a rock, or, another sled.
E、Because the traditional wooden sled can carry more than one rider, an accident involving a wooden sled can result in several children being injured.

答案:

C

提问:

请唐老师解析一下,谢谢.先读最后句,基于sledding时受伤小孩的数量较10年前更高,塑料sled更危险. 然后读选项, 获知塑料和木头间存在一种比较..C选项, 我觉得它只是说应用广泛, 和危险不沾边; A选项是削弱证据可靠性,是指出数量包含木制和塑料2种,非仅塑料

解答:

点赞0
阅读683
解答: 唐瑭

提问:

请唐老师解析一下,谢谢.先读最后句,基于sledding时受伤小孩的数量较10年前更高,塑料sled更危险. 然后读选项, 获知塑料和木头间存在一种比较..C选项, 我觉得它只是说应用广泛, 和危险不沾边; A选项是削弱证据可靠性,是指出数量包含木制和塑料2种,非仅塑料

解答:

点赞0
阅读684
解答: 唐瑭老师

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询