还没有登录哦!

[Critical Reasoning]

试题详情

题目:

Mice that have been given morphine are very likely to develop blood poisoning because bacteria that normally reside in the intestine typically respond to morphine by migrating into the bloodstream.  However, when mice are given both morphine and the new drug naltrexone, blood poisoning is much less frequent, although it does still occur.  These results provide support for researchers' prediction that naltrexone will turn out to be toxic to certain types of bacteria.
 
Which of the following, if discovered to be true, would most seriously weaken the support for the researchers' prediction?

选项:

A、After being administered to mice, naltrexone does not pass from the bloodstream into the intestine.
B、Naltrexone inhibits morphine from triggering the migration of intestinal bacteria into the bloodstream.
C、Mice that have been given naltrexone but not morphine have no greater risk of developing blood poisoning than do mice that have not been given either substance.
D、The increased risk of blood poisoning is not the only harmful effect on mice of being given morphine.
E、Conditions other than the presence of intestinal bacteria in the bloodstream can cause blood poisoning in mice.

答案:

B

提问:

想问下唐瑭老师,这里问题说,削弱对prediction的support,那看原文时是不是只需要看support的内容呢?prediction的内容需要看吗?

解答:

点赞1
阅读3025
解答: 唐瑭

提问:

想问下唐瑭老师,这里问题说,削弱对prediction的support,那看原文时是不是只需要看support的内容呢?prediction的内容需要看吗?

解答:

点赞1
阅读3026
解答: 唐瑭老师

提问:

CDE一下子就能排除掉,剩下A/B两个选项。听了录音后知道A错误的原因是方向性是相反的,B是一个它因驳斥。 我的问题是:在自己第一遍做题过程并不是分析错题过程中,怎么样才能够在两个均相关选项中选出正确答案?在自己做训练的过程中怎样加强这方面的能力?

解答:

点赞0
阅读4293
解答: sysadmin老师

提问:

还是A/B 个人还是觉得A好 原因如下:1 文章中确实说过那个细菌是定居在I那个地方的,并且最后结论说的就是细菌跟那个N玩意儿的关系 2 要是我非要分支持还是驳斥 那A才是驳斥啊……

解答:

点赞0
阅读4163
解答: sysadmin老师

提问:

这是我今天做的一到CR,这道题我选了E, 感觉这道题一定要读懂意思才能做的出, 最近做CR,很深刻的感觉到如果读不出题目意思,就很难做对,而且会花费很多时间……

解答:

点赞1
阅读4116
解答: sysadmin老师

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询