还没有登录哦！
[Sentence Correction]
试题详情
题目：
Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their clients' misconduct stemmed from a reaction to something ingested, but in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy, the perpetrators are in effect told that they are not responsible for their actions.
选项:
A、in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy,
B、if criminal or delinquent behavior is attributed to an allergy to some food,
C、in attributing behavior that is criminal or delinquent to an allergy to some food,
D、if some food allergy is attributed as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior,
E、in attributing a food allergy as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior,
答案:
B
提问：
老师好，这道问题我的情况是语意上已经理解是attorneys 发出动作，但是却没有把perpetuators 作为主句，而认为是attorney。这里因为没有标志词，我想请问一下如何快速确认后者是主句呢？老师在读句子的时候初步先明白核心句意，下一步的思考是不是就会划分主句和从句？
解答：
点赞0
阅读1685
提问：
老师好，这道问题我的情况是语意上已经理解是attorneys 发出动作，但是却没有把perpetuators 作为主句，而认为是attorney。这里因为没有标志词，我想请问一下如何快速确认后者是主句呢？老师在读句子的时候初步先明白核心句意，下一步的思考是不是就会划分主句和从句？
解答：
点赞0
阅读1686
提问：
我选的时候就B和D搞的有点晕
解答：
点赞1
阅读2046
提问：
不知道如何比较
解答：
点赞0
阅读2082
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
