还没有登录哦!

[Critical Reasoning]

试题详情

题目:

In Rubaria, excellent health care is available to virtually the entire population, whereas very few people in Terland receive adequate medical care.  Yet, although the death rate for most diseases is higher in Terland than in Rubaria, the percentage of the male population that dies from prostate cancer is significantly higher in Rubaria than in Terland.
 
Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the disparity between the prostate cancer death rate in Rubaria and Terland?

选项:

A、Effective treatment of prostate cancer in its early stages generally requires medical techniques available in Rubaria but not in Terland.
B、Most men who have prostate cancer are older than the average life expectancy for male inhabitants of Terland.
C、Being in poor general health does not increase one's risk of developing prostate cancer.
D、It is possible to decrease one's risk of getting prostate cancer by eating certain kinds of foods, and such foods are more readily available in Rubaria than in Terland.
E、Among men in Rubaria, the death rate from prostate cancer is significantly higher for those who do not take full advantage of Rubaria's health care system than for those who do.

答案:

B

提问:

请问张慧雯老师,本题是解释题,先说说我的理解:背景信息是r国的医疗条件比t国好。需要我们解释的东西:为什么R国男人死于癌症的比例比T国大,但是T国的死亡率却大于R国呢?我觉得A就说R国医疗条件好,所以虽然得了病但是不死人啊,为什么A不对?然后也纠结了一下e,因为我觉得这里的两国的差异就是在医疗条件上面,不然他介绍这个背景信息就没有意义了,想请问老师背景信息是解题暗含的线索吗?还是有时候无关,请老师讲解如何排除AE.

解答:

点赞0
阅读1526
解答: 张慧雯

提问:

请问张慧雯老师,本题是解释题,先说说我的理解:背景信息是r国的医疗条件比t国好。需要我们解释的东西:为什么R国男人死于癌症的比例比T国大,但是T国的死亡率却大于R国呢?我觉得A就说R国医疗条件好,所以虽然得了病但是不死人啊,为什么A不对?然后也纠结了一下e,因为我觉得这里的两国的差异就是在医疗条件上面,不然他介绍这个背景信息就没有意义了,想请问老师背景信息是解题暗含的线索吗?还是有时候无关,请老师讲解如何排除AE.

解答:

点赞0
阅读1527
解答: 张慧雯老师

提问:

B选项读不太懂,看E感觉跟原文沾边就选了

解答:

点赞0
阅读2020
解答: sysadmin老师

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询