还没有登录哦!

[Reading Comprehension]

试题详情

文章:

    For many years, historians thought that the development of capitalism had not faced serious challenges in the United States. Writing in the early twentieth century, Progressive historians sympathized with the battles waged by farmers and small producers against large capitalists in the late nineteenth century, but they did not question the widespread acceptance of laissez-faire (unregulated) capitalism throughout American history. Similarly, Louis Hartz, who sometimes disagreed with the Progressives, argued that Americans accepted laissez-faire capitalism without challenge because they lacked a feudal, precapitalist past. Recently, however, some scholars have argued that even though laissez-faire became the prevailing ethos in nineteen-century America, it was not accepted without struggle. Laissez-faire capitalism, they suggest, clashed with existing religious and communitarian norms that imposed moral constraints on acquisitiveness to protect the weak from the predatory, the strong from corruption, and the entire culture from materialist excess. Buttressed by mercantilist notions that government should be both regulator and promoter of economic activity, these norms persisted long after the American Revolution helped unleash the economic forces that produced capitalism. These scholars argue that even in the late nineteenth century, with the government's role in the economy considerably diminished, laissez-faire had not triumphed completely. Hard times continued to revive popular demands for regulating business and softening the harsh edges of aissez-faire capitalism.

题目:

According to the passage, the Progressive historians mentioned in the highlighted text and the scholars mentioned in the highlighted text disagree with regard to which of the following?

选项:

A、Whether laissez-faire became the predominant ethos in the nineteenth-century United States
B、Whether moral restraints on acquisitiveness were necessary in the nineteen-century United States
C、The economic utility of mercantilist notions of government
D、The nature of the historical conditions necessary for the development of laissez-faire capitalism in the nineteen-century United States
E、The existence of significant opposition to the development of laissez-faire capitalism in the nineteen-century United States

答案:

E

提问:

请问张慧雯老师,本题我的理解是Progressive historians they did not question the widespread acceptance of laissez-faire (unregulated) capitalism throughout American history. 然后那些学者就质疑这个laissez-faire 。AE中如何抉择呢?为什么A出错概率高一些?是不是原因在于 became the predominant ethos 这个的表述

解答:

点赞1
阅读650
解答: 张慧雯

提问:

请问张慧雯老师,本题我的理解是Progressive historians they did not question the widespread acceptance of laissez-faire (unregulated) capitalism throughout American history. 然后那些学者就质疑这个laissez-faire 。AE中如何抉择呢?为什么A出错概率高一些?是不是原因在于 became the predominant ethos 这个的表述

解答:

点赞1
阅读651
解答: 张慧雯老师

提问:

我的逻辑是Progressive Historian的观点是xxx,but xxx(反对前面historian的观点),however xxx(肯定historian的观点),之后scholars的观点用来支持这个肯定。所以应该是对第四行这个but立即有错误,导致我认为历史学家与学者的观点是一致的。

解答:

点赞0
阅读1429
解答: sysadmin老师

提问:

遇到这种题目我会很自然的把Progressive historians 和some scholars的观点看一遍,可是这样要读的东西就太多,读到最后一句前文就忘了。 想问一下唐唐老师这道题的做题逻辑简单一点应该是怎样的

解答:

点赞0
阅读1453
解答: sysadmin老师

提问:

问题问2个作者都不同意什么,因此定位到some scholars后面内容,说it was not accepted without struggle,请问这是如何推出E选项的?

解答:

点赞0
阅读1476
解答: sysadmin老师

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询