还没有登录哦！
[Reading Comprehension]
试题详情
文章：
Jon Clark’s study of the effect of the modernization of a telephone exchange on exchange maintenance work and workers is a solid contribution to a debate that encompasses two lively issues in the history and sociology of technology: technological determinism and social constructivism.
Clark makes the point that the characteristics of a technology have a decisive influence on job skills and work organization. Put more strongly, technology can be a primary determinant of social and managerial organization. Clark believes this possibility has been obscured by the recent sociological fashion, exemplified by Braverman’s analysis, that emphasizes the way machinery reflects social choices. For Braverman, the shape of a technological system is subordinate to the manager’s desire to wrest control of the labor process from the workers. Technological change is construed as the outcome of negotiations among interested parties who seek to incorporate their own interests into the design and configuration of the machinery. This position represents the new mainstream called social constructivism.
The constructivists gain acceptance by misrepresenting technological determinism: technological determinists are supposed to believe, for example, that machinery imposes appropriate forms of order on society. The alternative to constructivism, in other words, is to view technology as existing outside society, capable of directly influencing skills and work organization.
Clark refutes the extremes of the constructivists by both theoretical and empirical arguments. Theoretically he defines "technology" in terms of relationships between social and technical variables. Attempts to reduce the meaning of technology to cold, hard metal are bound to fail, for machinery is just scrap unless it is organized functionally and supported by appropriate systems of operation and maintenance. At the empirical level Clark shows how a change at the telephone exchange from maintenance-intensive electromechanical switches to semi-electronic switching systems altered work tasks, skills, training opportunities, administration, and organization of workers. Some changes Clark attributes to the particular way management and labor unions negotiated the introduction of the technology, whereas others are seen as arising from the capabilities and nature of the technology itself. Thus Clark helps answer the question: "When is social choice decisive and when are the concrete characteristics of technology more important?"
Clark makes the point that the characteristics of a technology have a decisive influence on job skills and work organization. Put more strongly, technology can be a primary determinant of social and managerial organization. Clark believes this possibility has been obscured by the recent sociological fashion, exemplified by Braverman’s analysis, that emphasizes the way machinery reflects social choices. For Braverman, the shape of a technological system is subordinate to the manager’s desire to wrest control of the labor process from the workers. Technological change is construed as the outcome of negotiations among interested parties who seek to incorporate their own interests into the design and configuration of the machinery. This position represents the new mainstream called social constructivism.
The constructivists gain acceptance by misrepresenting technological determinism: technological determinists are supposed to believe, for example, that machinery imposes appropriate forms of order on society. The alternative to constructivism, in other words, is to view technology as existing outside society, capable of directly influencing skills and work organization.
Clark refutes the extremes of the constructivists by both theoretical and empirical arguments. Theoretically he defines "technology" in terms of relationships between social and technical variables. Attempts to reduce the meaning of technology to cold, hard metal are bound to fail, for machinery is just scrap unless it is organized functionally and supported by appropriate systems of operation and maintenance. At the empirical level Clark shows how a change at the telephone exchange from maintenance-intensive electromechanical switches to semi-electronic switching systems altered work tasks, skills, training opportunities, administration, and organization of workers. Some changes Clark attributes to the particular way management and labor unions negotiated the introduction of the technology, whereas others are seen as arising from the capabilities and nature of the technology itself. Thus Clark helps answer the question: "When is social choice decisive and when are the concrete characteristics of technology more important?"
题目：
Which of the following statements about the modernization of the telephone exchange is supported by information in the passage?
选项:
A、The new technology reduced the role of managers in labor negotiations.The modernization was implemented without the consent of the employees directly affected by it.
B、The modernization had an impact that went significantly beyond maintenance routines.
C、Some of the maintenance workers felt victimized by the new technology.
D、The modernization gave credence to the view of advocates of social constructivism.
答案:
C
提问：
请教张慧雯老师，听了本题您上面的讲解，感觉这篇文章理解难度蛮大的，想问问这篇文章算是高分库的文章吗？因为考场上短时间内很难梳理结构，我第一次的定位在： the shape of a technological system is subordinate to the manager’s desire to wrest control of the labor process from the workers. Technological change is construed as the outcome of negotiations among interested parties who seek to incorporate their own interests into the design and configuration of the machinery. 应该是b那个人的观点了，第一次选了a。
解答：
点赞0
阅读1772
提问：
请教张慧雯老师，听了本题您上面的讲解，感觉这篇文章理解难度蛮大的，想问问这篇文章算是高分库的文章吗？因为考场上短时间内很难梳理结构，我第一次的定位在： the shape of a technological system is subordinate to the manager’s desire to wrest control of the labor process from the workers. Technological change is construed as the outcome of negotiations among interested parties who seek to incorporate their own interests into the design and configuration of the machinery. 应该是b那个人的观点了，第一次选了a。
解答：
点赞0
阅读1773
提问：
这题原文没找到beyond maintenance rountines的来源。不知道从逻辑上为何能把c选出来。
同时请老师解答一下JC这个人的观点是支持technology还是social那派的？第二段看到他认为B这个人的观点是模糊不清的，B是social派的，因此我做的时候就认为J是techonoly派的。但后面听其他解答，好像感觉J是中立派的。觉得模糊。
解答：
点赞0
阅读2293
提问：
根据the modernization of the telephone exchange定位到第一段第一句，虽然知道这句话不能回答问题，但是往下的话更没必要读了。但是没有一个选项与我读的沾边。
解答：
点赞-1
阅读2208
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
