还没有登录哦!

[Reading Comprehension]

试题详情

文章:

Line         It is an odd but indisputable fact that the
  seventeenth-century English women who are
  generally regarded as among the forerunners of
  modern feminism are almost all identified with the
(5) Royalist side in the conflict between Royalists and
  Parliamentarians known as the English Civil Wars.
  Since Royalist ideology is often associated with the
  radical patriarchalism of seventeenth-century
  political theorist Robert Filmer—a patriarchalism
(10) that equates family and kingdom and asserts the
  divinely ordained absolute power of the king and,
  by analogy, of the male head of the household—
  historians have been understandably puzzled by the
  fact that Royalist women wrote the earliest
(15) extended criticisms of the absolute subordination
  of women in marriage and the earliest systematic
  assertions of women’s rational and moral equality
  with men. Some historians have questioned the
  facile equation of Royalist ideology with Filmerian
(20) patriarchalism; and indeed, there may have been
  no consistent differences between Royalists and
  Parliamentarians on issues of family organization
  and women’s political rights, but in that case one
  would expect early feminists to be equally divided
(25) between the two sides.
       Catherine Gallagher argues that Royalism
  engendered feminism because the ideology of
  absolute monarchy provided a transition to an
  ideology of the absolute self. She cites the example
(30) of the notoriously eccentric author Margaret
  Cavendish (1626–1673), duchess of Newcastle.
  Cavendish claimed to be as ambitious as any
  woman could be, but knowing that as a woman she
  was excluded from the pursuit of power in the real
(35) world, she resolved to be mistress of her own
  world, the “immaterial world” that any person can
  create within her own mind—and, as a writer, on
  paper. In proclaiming what she called her
  “singularity,” Cavendish insisted that she was a
(40) self-sufficient being within her mental empire, the
  center of her own subjective universe rather than a
  satellite orbiting a dominant male planet. In
  justifying this absolute singularity, Cavendish
  repeatedly invoked the model of the absolute
(45) monarch, a figure that became a metaphor for the
  self-enclosed, autonomous nature of the individual
  person. Cavendish’s successors among early
  feminists retained her notion of woman’s sovereign
  self, but they also sought to break free from the
(50) complete political and social isolation that her
  absolute singularity entailed.


题目:

The passage suggests which of the following about the seventeenth-century English women mentioned in line 2?

选项:

A、Their status as forerunners of modern feminism is not entirely justified.
B、They did not openly challenge the radical patriarchalism of Royalist Filmerian ideology.
C、Cavendish was the first among these women to criticize women’s subordination in marriage and assert women’s equality with men.
D、Their views on family organization and women’s political rights were diametrically opposed to those of both Royalist and Parliamentarian ideology.
E、Historians would be less puzzled if more of them were identified with the Parliamentarian side in the English Civil Wars.

答案:

E

提问:

请问张慧雯老师,本题我的定位和思路,seventeenth-century English women who are generally regarded as among the forerunners of modern feminism are almost all identified with the Royalist side in the conflict between Royalists and Parliamentarians known as the English Civil Wars.我的理解是17世纪英国的女性是forerunners of modern feminism ,在R和P里产生了争议,所以就选了a,请老师指出我的问题。

解答:

点赞0
阅读1658
解答: 张慧雯

提问:

请问张慧雯老师,本题我的定位和思路,seventeenth-century English women who are generally regarded as among the forerunners of modern feminism are almost all identified with the Royalist side in the conflict between Royalists and Parliamentarians known as the English Civil Wars.我的理解是17世纪英国的女性是forerunners of modern feminism ,在R和P里产生了争议,所以就选了a,请老师指出我的问题。

解答:

点赞0
阅读1659
解答: 张慧雯老师

提问:

这道阅读题主旨难抓,而且题目答案不好找,想让文静老师稍微带一下

解答:

点赞0
阅读2147
解答: 王文静老师

提问:

1. 这一题的答案是不是根据第一句的odd but indisputable判断的? 2. 这种要推断文章意思,又给出了行数的,应该把所在行的句子看完就可以还是需要读取更多信息?

解答:

点赞0
阅读2382
解答: 郭培月老师

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询