还没有登录哦!

[Reading Comprehension]

试题详情

文章:

    Two opposing scenarios, the "arboreal" hypothesis and the "cursorial" hypothesis, have traditionally been put forward concerning the origins of bird flight. The "arboreal" hypothesis holds that bird ancestors began to fly by climbing frees and gliding down from branches with the help of incipient feathers: the height of trees provides a good starting place for launching flight, especially through gliding. As feathers became larger over time, flapping flight evolved and birds finally became fully air-borne. This hypothesis makes intuitive Sense, but certain aspects are Troubling. Archaeopteryx (the earliest known bird) and its maniraptoran dinosaur cousins have no obviously arboreal adaptations, such as feet fully adapted for perching. Perhaps some of them could climb trees, but no convincing analysis has demonstrated how Archaeopteryx would have both climbed and flown with its forelimbs, and there were no plants taller than a few meters in the environments where Archaeopteryx fossils have been found. Even if the animals could climb trees, this ability is not synonymous with gliding ability. (Many small animals, and even some goats and kangaroos, are capable of climbing trees but are not gliders.) Besides, Archaeopteryx shows no obvious features of gliders, such as a broad membrane connecting forelimbs and hind limbs.

    The "cursorial"(running) hypothesis holds that small dinosaurs ran along the ground and stretched out their arms for balance as they leaped into the air after insect prey or, perhaps, to avoid predators. Even rudimentary feathers on forelimbs could have expanded the arm's surface area to enhance lift slightly. Larger feathers could have increased lift incrementally, until sustained flight was gradually achieved. Of course, a leap into the air does not provide the acceleration produced by dropping out of a tree; an animal would have to run quite fast to take off. Still, some small terrestrial animals can achieve high speeds. The cursorial hypothesis is strengthened by the fact that the immediate theropod dinosaur ancestors of birds were terrestrial, and they had the traits needed for high lift off speeds: they were small, agile, lightly built, long-legged, and good runners. And because they were bipedal, their arms were free to evolve flapping flight, which cannot be said for other reptiles of their time.

题目:

The passage presents which of the following facts as evidence that tends to undermine the arboreal hypothesis?

选项:

A、Feathers tend to become larger over time
B、Flapping flight is thought to have evolved gradually over time
C、Many small animals are capable of climbing trees.
D、Plants in Archaeopteryx's known habitats were relatively small
E、Leaping into the air does not provide as much acceleration as gliding out of a tree

答案:

D

提问:

我的定位点:he "arboreal" hypothesis holds that bird ancestors began to fly by climbing frees and gliding down from branches with the help of incipient feathers:所以选了e,请问张慧雯老师我的做题思路和定位点的问题出在哪里?

解答:

点赞0
阅读1157
解答: 张慧雯

提问:

我的定位点:he "arboreal" hypothesis holds that bird ancestors began to fly by climbing frees and gliding down from branches with the help of incipient feathers:所以选了e,请问张慧雯老师我的做题思路和定位点的问题出在哪里?

解答:

点赞0
阅读1158
解答: 张慧雯老师

提问:

老师讲的是找与这个假设的内容有关的,选项与这个假设的内容有没有沾。但是我看到问驳斥,而第一段是在说A这个观点,就在第一段找转折,找到了but certain aspects are Troubling.,下面文章具体在说这个trouble,就读了半天第一段的后面部分,还选不出答案,求老师指正我的思路的错误。

解答:

点赞0
阅读1475
解答: sysadmin老师

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询