还没有登录哦！
[Critical Reasoning]
试题详情
题目：
A provincial government plans to raise the gasoline tax to give people an incentive to drive less, reducing traffic congestion in the long term. However, skeptics point out that most people in the province live in areas where cars are the only viable transportation to jobs and stores and therefore cannot greatly change their driving habits in response to higher gasoline prices.
In light of the skeptics’ objection, which of the following, if true, would most logically support the prediction that the government’s plan will achieve its goal of reducing traffic congestion?
In light of the skeptics’ objection, which of the following, if true, would most logically support the prediction that the government’s plan will achieve its goal of reducing traffic congestion?
选项:
A、The revenue from the tax will be used to make public transportation a viable means of transportation to jobs and stores for far more people.
B、The tax will encourage many residents to switch to more fuel-efficient cars, reducing air pollution and other problems.
C、Because gasoline has been underpriced for decades, the province has many neighborhoods where cars are the only viable means of transportation.
D、Most residents who cannot greatly change their driving habits could compensate for high gasoline prices by reducing other expenses.
E、Traffic congestion is an especially serious problem for people for whom cars are the only viable means of transportation.
答案:
A
提问：
这一题想请唐塘老师解答一下，想听听唐塘老师的做法做这道题，我自己按照唐塘老师的做题技巧在ab中纠结，b的错误是没有直接的提到交通堵塞这件事嘛
解答：
点赞0
阅读359
提问：
这一题想请唐塘老师解答一下，想听听唐塘老师的做法做这道题，我自己按照唐塘老师的做题技巧在ab中纠结，b的错误是没有直接的提到交通堵塞这件事嘛
解答：
点赞0
阅读360
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
