还没有登录哦！
[Critical Reasoning]
试题详情
文章：
In the arid land along the Colorado River, use of the river's water supply is strictly controlled：farms along the river each have a limited allocation that they are allowed to use for irrigation.But the trees that grow in narrow strips along the river's banks also use its water.Clearly, therefore, if farmers were to remove those trees, more water would be available for crop irrigation.
题目：
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
选项:
A、The trees along the river's banks shelter it from the sun and wind, thereby greatly reducing the amount of water lost through evaporationOwners of farms along the river will probably not undertake the expense of cutting down trees along the banks unless they are granted a greater allocation of water in return.
B、Owners of farms along the river will probably not undertake the expense of cutting down trees along the banks unless they are granted a greater allocation of water in return.
C、The strip of land where trees grow along the river's banks would not be suitable for growing crops if the trees were removed.
D、The distribution of water allocations for irrigation is intended to prevent farms farther upstream from using water needed by farms farther downstream.
答案:
A
提问：
请唐塘老师分析一下这道题，谢谢，感觉好像只读最后一句话得不到答案
解答：
点赞0
阅读716
提问：
请唐塘老师分析一下这道题，谢谢，感觉好像只读最后一句话得不到答案
解答：
点赞0
阅读717
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
