还没有登录哦！
[Critical Reasoning]
试题详情
题目：
In 1563, in Florence's Palazzo Vecchio, Giorgio Vasari built in front of an existing wall a new wall on which he painted a mural. Investigators recently discovered a gap between Vasari's wall and the original, large enough to have preserved anything painted on the original. Historians believe that Leonardo da Vinci had painted, but left unfinished, a mural on the original wall; some historians had also believed that by 1563 the mural had been destroyed. However, it is known that in the late 1560s, when renovating another building, Santa Maria Novella, Vasari built a façade over its frescoes, and the frescoes were thereby preserved. Thus, Leonardo's Palazzo Vecchio mural probably still exists behind Vasari's wall.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
选项:
A、Leonardo rarely if ever destroyed artworks that he left unfinished.
B、Vasari was likely unaware that the mural in the Palazzo Vecchio had willingly been abandoned by Leonardo.
C、Vasari probably would not have built the Palazzo Vecchio wall with a gap behind it except to preserve something behind the new wall.
D、Leonardo would probably have completed the Palazzo Vecchio mural if he had had the opportunity to do so.
E、When Vasari preserved the frescoes of Santa Maria Novella he did so secretly.
答案:
C
提问：
请问英吉老师，我应该把逻辑链提炼错了，我第一遍做的时候是认为，reason是V建新墙把原来墙上达芬奇没有画完的画盖住了；结论是Thus后面的这幅画还在。所以我选了A，达芬奇很少会毁掉自己没完成的画，我觉得能和我提炼出来的reason互补，提升结论可信度，应该怎么看对的逻辑链呢？
解答：
点赞1
阅读2236
提问：
请问英吉老师，我应该把逻辑链提炼错了，我第一遍做的时候是认为，reason是V建新墙把原来墙上达芬奇没有画完的画盖住了；结论是Thus后面的这幅画还在。所以我选了A，达芬奇很少会毁掉自己没完成的画，我觉得能和我提炼出来的reason互补，提升结论可信度，应该怎么看对的逻辑链呢？
解答：
点赞1
阅读2237
提问：
题目读多遍都理解不了，如何破题？
解答：
点赞0
阅读2533
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
