还没有登录哦！
[Critical Reasoning]
试题详情
题目：
The recycling of municipal solid waste is widely seen as an environmentally preferable alternative to the prevailing practices of incineration and of dumping in landfills. Recycling is profitable, as the recycling programs already in operation demonstrate. A state legislator proposes that communities should therefore be required to adopt recycling and to reach the target of recycling 50 percent of all solid waste within 5 years.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously calls into question the advisability of implementing the proposal?
选项:
A、Existing recycling programs have been voluntary, with citizen participation ranging from 30 percent in some communities to 80 percent in others.
B、Existing recycling programs have been restricted to that 20 percent of solid waste that, when reprocessed, can match processed raw materials in quality and price.
C、Existing recycling programs have had recurrent difficulties finding purchasers for their materials, usually because of quantities too small to permit cost-effective pickup and transportation.
D、Some of the materials that can be recycled are the very materials that, when incinerated, produce the least pollution.
E、Many of the materials that cannot be recycled are also difficult to incinerate.
答案:
B
提问：
老师这道题不是说回收是对环境好的 然后还有利润，那为什么不选d呢？而且b是什么意思完全没看懂啊？是说现在方案限制了只有20%可以匹配质量和价格，那改了方案有可能就不止20%了啊
解答：
点赞0
阅读1662
提问：
老师这道题不是说回收是对环境好的 然后还有利润，那为什么不选d呢？而且b是什么意思完全没看懂啊？是说现在方案限制了只有20%可以匹配质量和价格，那改了方案有可能就不止20%了啊
解答：
点赞0
阅读1663
提问：
没明白为什么选B
解答：
点赞0
阅读1874
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
