还没有登录哦！
[Critical Reasoning]
试题详情
题目：
Most geologists believe oil results from chemical transformations of hydrocarbons derived from organisms buried under ancient seas. Suppose, instead, that oil actually results from bacterial action on other complex hydrocarbons that are trapped within the earth. As is well known, the volume of these hydrocarbons exceeds that of buried organisms. Therefore, our oil reserves would be greater than most geologists believe.
Which of the following, if true, gives the strongest support to the argument above about our oil reserves?
选项:
A、Most geologists think optimistically about the earth’s reserves of oil.
B、Most geologists have performed accurate chemical analyses on previously discovered oil reserves.
C、Ancient seas are buried within the earth at many places where fossils are abundant.
D、The only bacteria yet found in oil reserves could have leaked down drill holes from surface contaminants.
E、Chemical transformations reduce the volume of buried hydrocarbons derived from organisms by roughly the same proportion as bacterial action reduces the volume of other complex hydrocarbons.
答案:
E
提问：
请问这道题只看therefore后面这一句能不能做呢，还是说必须看完所有原文。如果只看后面的，怎么判断E是相关的呢
解答：
点赞0
阅读2222
提问：
请问这道题只看therefore后面这一句能不能做呢，还是说必须看完所有原文。如果只看后面的，怎么判断E是相关的呢
解答：
点赞0
阅读2223
提问：
题目说地理学家相信油从海里用化学提取出来。但其实是用细菌乱七八糟的方式从地里给搞出来。所以油的总量要比科学家想的多。abcd其实都没有关联，我都能排走，但是就是不知道e怎么去理解。谢谢老师花时间解答
解答：
点赞2
阅读2218
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
