还没有登录哦!

[Critical Reasoning]

试题详情

题目:

The heavy traffic in Masana is a growing drain on the city's economy—the clogging of the streets of the central business district alone cost the economy more than $1.2 billion over the past year. In order to address this problem, officials plan to introduce congestion pricing, by which drivers would pay to enter the city's most heavily trafficked areas during the busiest times of the day.

Which of the following, if true, would most strongly indicate that the plan will be a success?

选项:

A、Approximately one-fifth of the vehicles in the central business district are in transit from one side of the city to the other.
B、Planners expect that, without congestion pricing, traffic in Masana is likely to grow by 6 percent in the next five years.
C、In other urban areas, congestion pricing has strongly encouraged carpooling (sharing of rides by private commuters).
D、Several studies have shown that a reduction in traffic of 15 percent in Masana could result in 5,500 or more new jobs.
E、Over 30 percent of the vehicles in the city's center are occupied by more than one person.

答案:

C

提问:

想问下老师这个题C为啥是对的呢 我选了B 反思了一下 觉得B没有说方案实施之后的影响 但是C是不是也用了类比 难道不算主观判断吗?

解答:

点赞1
阅读2051
解答: 王文静

提问:

@唐瑭老师,请问唐瑭老师,这题错选了B。我的思路是题干提示看plan,就只看plan的内容,plan说政府要收拥堵费去,就是让司机们付钱当他们在交通最繁忙的时候进入市区时。说的是要收费和交通拥堵的事情。A说的是穿过CBD的车的数量多少,无关。B说不收拥堵费的话交通会增长,沾边。C说的是其他城市的事情,无关。D减轻交通和产生新工作岗位的事情,无关。E说车辆被多少人使用的事情,无关。为什么选C?麻烦老师帮我分析~~

解答:

点赞1
阅读1982
解答: 唐瑭老师

提问:

想问下老师这个题C为啥是对的呢 我选了B 反思了一下 觉得B没有说方案实施之后的影响 但是C是不是也用了类比 难道不算主观判断吗?

解答:

点赞1
阅读2052
解答: 王文静老师

提问:

请老师梳理一下逻辑链,请问A为什么不对?谢谢老师

解答:

点赞0
阅读2201
解答: 英吉老师

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询