还没有登录哦!

[Sentence Correction]

试题详情

题目:

A natural response of communities devastated by earthquake or flood is to rebuild on the same site, overlooking the possibility that the forces that caused it could be repeated.

选项:

A、overlooking the possibility that the forces that caused it could be repeated
B、overlooking the possibility that the forces causing it could be repeated
C、overlooking that the forces that caused the disaster could also cause another one
D、without considering that the forces causing the disaster could be repeated
E、without considering that the forces that caused the disaster could also cause another such disaster

答案:

E

提问:

请问金栩竹老师,E中的cause another disaster为什么要优于D中的could be repeated呢?我认为D这样的表达方式更简洁,但是不是在这里could be repeated就是没有表达清楚句意呢?谢谢老师

解答:

点赞0
阅读3417
解答: 金栩竹

提问:

请王文静老师解释下这道题的做题思路 开始做的时候觉得forces repeat 好像有点怪但也不太确定,然后最后选了c

解答:

点赞0
阅读2989
解答: 王文静老师

提问:

请问金栩竹老师,E中的cause another disaster为什么要优于D中的could be repeated呢?我认为D这样的表达方式更简洁,但是不是在这里could be repeated就是没有表达清楚句意呢?谢谢老师

解答:

点赞0
阅读3418
解答: 金栩竹老师

提问:

提问陆旭老师:又来请教老师了。这题我选了C。E选项这个cause another such disaster感觉读起来也太变扭了。我看网上讨论说C的这个one指代不清,真的是指代不清吗?然后我想了想,C这里是不是overlooking that也不对,overlook是不是后面得接一个东西,而不是一个从句?

解答:

点赞0
阅读3506
解答: 陆旭老师

提问:

老师好,C overlooking 我觉得没有合适的修饰的主语,E without considering 是不是有同样的问题?

解答:

点赞0
阅读3421
解答: 金栩竹老师

提问:

老师,您好。这道题我想问ce选项的比较。c one 指莫个灾难,e such disaster指这类灾难,更清楚?

解答:

点赞0
阅读3554
解答: 金栩竹老师

提问:

此题我可以通过语意排除 剩下C和E 可是这两个怎么比较呢 两者意思存在差别吗?overlooking是否强于without considering?或者C选项问题出在后面one的指代不清?

解答:

点赞0
阅读3467
解答: 金栩竹老师

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询