还没有登录哦！
[Critical Reasoning]
试题详情
题目：
In the United States, of the people who moved from one state to another when they retired, the percentage who retired to Florida has decreased by three percentage points over the past ten years. Since many local businesses in Florida cater to retirees, this decline is likely to have a noticeably negative economic effect on these businesses.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
选项:
A、Florida attracts more people who move from one state to another when they retire than does any other state.
B、The number of people who move out of Florida to accept employment in other states has increased over the past ten years.
C、There are far more local businesses in Florida that cater to tourists than there are local businesses that cater to retirees.
D、The total number of people who retired and moved to another state for their retirement has increased significantly over the past ten years.
E、The number of people who left Florida when they retired to live in another state was greater last year than it was ten years ago.
答案:
D
提问：
想问王文静老师，这道题中的D说的moved to another state是指这种退休搬走这种现象而不是指除了Florida之外的另一个城市对吧，退休搬州的人总量增加的情况下搬到Florida养老的人也会变多的话我能理解。但是我又想如果搬到F的人变多那从F搬走的人也多呀
解答：
点赞0
阅读3075
提问：
D我看成了another，因为前面一直在讲Florida，所以我直接把“another state”理解成“Florida以外的state”了，然后就理解成Florida退休后离开区其他州的人大幅度增加了。
解答：
点赞0
阅读761
提问：
想问王文静老师，这道题中的D说的moved to another state是指这种退休搬走这种现象而不是指除了Florida之外的另一个城市对吧，退休搬州的人总量增加的情况下搬到Florida养老的人也会变多的话我能理解。但是我又想如果搬到F的人变多那从F搬走的人也多呀
解答：
点赞0
阅读3076
提问：
这道题挺纠结的，请老师用排除法排除 C 和 A 选项，。
解答：
点赞1
阅读3213
提问：
这道题我选的时候，五个选项我都没有感觉到和问题中的结论——就是退休人数减不减少和经济衰不衰退的什么联系。。。听了英老师上次给那个同学讲的还是觉得云里雾里。所以希望老师能再讲一次，说一下为什么D较其他选项更好一些。谢谢咯~~
解答：
点赞-1
阅读3251
提问：
C选项说当地的公司很多是提供给tourists的，所以retiree人数的减少不会影响他们的经济效益，属于驳斥。但D说退休人员的总人数，原文没提过啊，无关。不知道C为什么错，D怎么跟原文沾边，请老师帮助解答一下。
解答：
点赞0
阅读3157
提问：
cr
解答：
点赞0
阅读3097
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
