还没有登录哦！
[Critical Reasoning]
试题详情
题目：
In order to reduce dependence on imported oil, the government of Jalica has imposed minimum fuel-efficiency requirements on all new cars, beginning this year. The more fuel-efficient a car, the less pollution it produces per mile driven. As Jalicans replace their old cars with cars that meet the new requirements, annual pollution from car traffic is likely to decrease in Jalica.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
选项:
A、
A. In Jalica, domestically produced oil is more expensive than imported oil.
B、
B. The Jalican government did not intend the new fuel-efficiency requirement to be a pollution-reduction measure.
C、
C. Some pollution-control devices mandated in Jalica make cars less fuel-efficient than they would be without those devices.
D、
D. The new regulation requires no change in the chemical formulation of fuel for cars in Jalica.
E、
E. Jalicans who get cars that are more fuel-efficient tend to do more driving than before.
答案:
E
提问：
这道题错选了C，当时觉得E需要主观推断不是很直接，C感觉直接聊了device可能有负面作用，所以觉得更近一点，可以请老师比较一下吗
解答：
点赞0
阅读899
提问：
这道题错选了C，当时觉得E需要主观推断不是很直接，C感觉直接聊了device可能有负面作用，所以觉得更近一点，可以请老师比较一下吗
解答：
点赞0
阅读900
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
