还没有登录哦!

[Critical Reasoning]

试题详情

题目:

When demand for a factory's products is high, more money is spent at the factory for safety precautions and machinery maintenance than when demand is low.  Thus the average number of on-the-job accidents per employee each month should be lower during periods when demand is high than when demand is low and less money is available for safety precautions and machinery maintenance.
Which of the following, if true about a factory when demand for its products is high, casts the most serious doubt on the conclusion drawn above?

选项:

A、Its employees ask for higher wages than they do at other times.
B、Its management hires new workers but lacks the time to train them properly.
C、Its employees are less likely to lose their jobs than they are at other times.
D、Its management sponsors a monthly safety award for each division in the factory.
E、Its old machinery is replaced with modern, automated models.

答案:

B

提问:

请问唐瑭老师,我这题是读了最后一句,感觉说的是员工的安全和用于保证安全的钱。感觉五个选项都不好,但D好像沾点边,就选了D。不知道为什么选B。

解答:

点赞0
阅读4656
解答: 唐瑭

提问:

请问唐瑭老师,我这题是读了最后一句,感觉说的是员工的安全和用于保证安全的钱。感觉五个选项都不好,但D好像沾点边,就选了D。不知道为什么选B。

解答:

点赞0
阅读4657
解答: 唐瑭老师

提问:

问题是对结论质疑,读结论,结论分为2块,1是high的时候比low的时候accident number低,以及钱少。ACE与结论都没有关系,BD选项中犹豫,觉得D选项提到了另外一种钱的来源的可能性,而且B选项中lack train与结论不是很相关,就选了D。请老师看一下我逻辑的错误,谢谢

解答:

点赞1
阅读4698
解答: 王文静老师

提问:

读题:需求高时,工厂的安全与维护费用就高了。需求低时则维护费用也低。所以月工伤数值在高需求时比在低需求时更低。 问下列选项哪个能削弱结论。 看到B时曾犹豫了一下,想新手受训不足,不就容易出事了么。但立刻意识到这是不可以有的发散。 读acde,立刻感觉范围不对劲。 请老师讲讲这B选项怎么理原文了。

解答:

点赞0
阅读4654
解答: sysadmin老师

提问:

读题:需求高时,工厂的安全与维护费用就高了。需求低时则维护费用也低。所以月工伤数值在高需求时比在低需求时更低。 问下列选项哪个能削弱结论。 看到B时曾犹豫了一下,想新手受训不足,不就容易出事了么。但立刻意识到自己推理了。 读acde可以立刻感觉范围不对劲。 然而答案写的B。请老师讲讲这道题的正确感觉该是怎么来的。

解答:

点赞0
阅读4661
解答: sysadmin老师

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询