还没有登录哦！
[Critical Reasoning]
试题详情
题目：
Tiger beetles are such fast runners that they can capture virtually any nonflying insect. However, when running toward an insect, the beetles intermittently stop, and then, a moment later, resume their attack. Perhaps they cannot maintain their pace and must pause for a moment's rest; but an alternative hypothesis is that while running tiger beetles are unable to process the resulting rapidly changing visual information, and so quickly go blind and stop.
Which of the following, if discovered in experiments using artificially moved prey insects, would support one of the two hypotheses and undermine the other?
Which of the following, if discovered in experiments using artificially moved prey insects, would support one of the two hypotheses and undermine the other?
选项:
A、When a prey insect is moved directly toward a beetle that has been chasing it, the beetle immediately turns and runs away without its usual intermittent stopping.
B、In pursuing a moving insect, the beetles usually respond immediately to changes in the insect's direction, and pause equally frequently whether the chase is up or down an incline.
C、The beetles maintain a fixed time interval between pauses, although when an insect that had been stationary begins to flee, the beetle increases its speed after its next pause.
D、If, when a beetle pauses, it has not gained on the insect it is pursuing, the beetle generally ends its pursuit.
E、When an obstacle is suddenly introduced just in front of running beetles, the beetles sometimes stop immediately, but they never respond by running around the barrier.
答案:
C
提问：
请Tina老师帮忙解答一下！以下是我自己的理解：在追逐虫子的过程中：一个是说这个tiger beetles 不能保持他们的步伐必须得停下来休息一段时间；另一个假设是说当他们在追逐时他们不能处理产生的快速变化的视觉信息，因此很快就会失明并停下来。
即解释为什么会停下来。说明肯定是会停下来的，只是为什么停下来产生了分歧。因为要+一个假设而-另一个假设，说明正确选项中肯定是体现了两方面的内容的。 麻烦老师帮我看看对不对！BCE没有搞清对应关系，没办法准确提取+-两方面来对应逻辑链，所以要麻烦老师帮忙点明怎么对应的！谢谢~
解答：
点赞1
阅读2640
提问：
请Tina老师帮忙解答一下！以下是我自己的理解：在追逐虫子的过程中：一个是说这个tiger beetles 不能保持他们的步伐必须得停下来休息一段时间；另一个假设是说当他们在追逐时他们不能处理产生的快速变化的视觉信息，因此很快就会失明并停下来。
即解释为什么会停下来。说明肯定是会停下来的，只是为什么停下来产生了分歧。因为要+一个假设而-另一个假设，说明正确选项中肯定是体现了两方面的内容的。 麻烦老师帮我看看对不对！BCE没有搞清对应关系，没办法准确提取+-两方面来对应逻辑链，所以要麻烦老师帮忙点明怎么对应的！谢谢~
解答：
点赞1
阅读2641
提问：
看了已有解答里英吉老师的回答，不知道为什么只有ce是讲了两件事情，感觉b也是讲了两件事情，一个是追着昆虫的方向，一个是经常停下来。不知道我理解的两个方向是不是英吉老师所说的两个方向。而且我也没搞清楚bc是如何驳斥，支持文章的，就感觉bc是相关的，想知道在这种情况下应该怎么做这个题呀？
解答：
点赞0
阅读2657
提问：
排除了A和D选项，但剩下选项和原文的关系完全不懂（我读的懂argument，但看不懂选项，也理不清选项和原文之间的关系）。想请教这种支持一个（假设），驳斥另一个（假设）的做题方法。
解答：
点赞0
阅读2810
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
