还没有登录哦！
[Critical Reasoning]
试题详情
题目：
In many corporations, employees are being replaced by automated equipment in order to save money. However, many workers who lose their jobs to automation will need government assistance to survive, and the same corporations that are laying people off will eventually pay for that assistance through increased taxes and unemployment insurance payments.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the author's argument?
选项:
A、Many workers who have already lost their jobs to automation have been unable to find new jobs.
B、Many corporations that have failed to automate have seen their profits decline.
C、Taxes and unemployment insurance are paid also by corporations that are not automating.
D、Most of the new jobs created by automation pay less than the jobs eliminated by automation did.
E、The initial investment in machinery for automation is often greater than the short-term savings in labor costs.
答案:
A
提问：
麻烦陆旭老师解释一下这道题
解答：
点赞0
阅读5897
提问：
麻烦陆旭老师解释一下这道题
解答：
点赞0
阅读5898
提问：
e選項如果投資automation的設施的錢多餘炒掉員工節省的錢 那就可以支持 這家公司不能節省錢的結論。請郭培月老師回答 謝謝
解答：
点赞0
阅读5959
提问：
这道题干在读的时候，逻辑关系比较模糊，以至于问到支持原文的时候，不知道支持哪里？或者说前提是什么、结论是什么搞不清。这道题属于不明显的结论题，考试中遇到的话我们应该怎么处理？
原文的意思我都能读懂，但感觉题干的结论不明显，也没觉得A哪里就支持了原文的结论
解答：
点赞0
阅读5874
提问：
这题答案我是没什么异议，不过我想问一下那个C选项是不是可以算作一个weaken选项、
解答：
点赞0
阅读5822
提问：
感觉原文说的是自动化和工人工资问题，觉得E是说这个啊。A说丢了工作的是否找到新工作，感觉是无关答案
解答：
点赞0
阅读5870
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
