还没有登录哦!

[Critical Reasoning]

试题详情

题目:

Some theorists and critics insist that no aesthetic evaluation of a work of art is sound if it is based even in part on data about the cultural background of the artist. This opinion is clearly false. The only sound aesthetic evaluations of artists’ works are those that take into account factors such as the era and the place of the artists’ births, their upbringing and education, and the values of their societies—in sum, those factors that are part of their cultural background.

The above argument is most vulnerable to which of the following objections?

选项:

A、The argument presupposes the conclusion for which it purports to provide evidence.
B、The argument cites evidence that undermines rather than supports the conclusion.
C、The argument draws its conclusion by means of an equivocal interpretation of key terms.
D、The argument assumes that the production of an effect is evidence of an intention to produce that effect.
E、The argument assumes that evaluative disputes can be resolved by citing factual evidence.

答案:

A

提问:

原题说:评论家说,如果即使美学的评论基于艺术家的文化背景,它是没有道理的。作者反对这个观点,说唯一有道理的美学评论是将这些乱七八糟的背景作为考量,而这些乱七八糟的东西是包括在文化背景里的。让我反驳这个作者。a这个选项说的特别不像人话,我看不太懂,麻烦老师给我讲讲。类似有这样的题目可以给我参考一下吗?谢谢老师解答。

解答:

点赞1
阅读1342
解答: 英吉

提问:

原题说:评论家说,如果即使美学的评论基于艺术家的文化背景,它是没有道理的。作者反对这个观点,说唯一有道理的美学评论是将这些乱七八糟的背景作为考量,而这些乱七八糟的东西是包括在文化背景里的。让我反驳这个作者。a这个选项说的特别不像人话,我看不太懂,麻烦老师给我讲讲。类似有这样的题目可以给我参考一下吗?谢谢老师解答。

解答:

点赞1
阅读1343
解答: 英吉老师

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询