还没有登录哦!

[Reading Comprehension]

试题详情

文章:

    Ecoefficiency (measures to minimize environmental impact through the reduction or elimination of waste from production processes) has become a goal for companies worldwide, with many realizing significant cost savings from such innovations. Peter Senge and Goran Carstedt see this development as laudable but suggest that simply adopting ecoefficiency innovations could actually worsen environmental stresses in the future. Such innovations reduce production waste but do not alter the number of products manufactured nor the waste generated from their use and discard; indeed, most companies invest in ecoefficiency improvements in order to increase profits and growth. Moreover, there is no guarantee that increased economic growth from ecoefficiency will come in similarly ecoefficient ways, since in today's global markets, greater profits may be turned into investment capital that could easily be reinvested in old-style eco-inefficient industries. Even a vastlymore ecoefficient industrial system could, were it to grow much larger, generate more total waste and destroy more habitat and species than would a smaller, less ecoefficient economy. Senge and Carstedt argue that to preserve the global environment and sustain economic growth, businesses must develop a new systemic approach that reduces total material use and total accumulated waste. Focusing exclusively on ecoefficiency, which offers a compelling business case according to established thinking, may distract companies from pursuing radically different products and business models.

题目:

The primary purpose of the passage is to

选项:

A、explain why a particular business strategy has been less successful than was once anticipated
B、propose an alternative to a particular business strategy that has inadvertently caused ecological damage
C、present a concern about the possible consequences of pursuing a particular business strategy
D、make a case for applying a particular business strategy on a larger scale than is currently practiced
E、suggest several possible outcomes of companies' failure to understand the economic impact of a particular business strategy

答案:

C

提问:

为什么这题不能选A呢?文章一开始不是说了Ecoefficiency的好处,然后就开始讲述它可能产生的不好的效果嘛?麻烦老师解答,谢谢!

解答:

点赞1
阅读1942
解答: 张慧雯

提问:

请问张慧雯老师,虽然我选对了,但是还是想问问e选项如何排除。本文我的理解正如您上面说的这样:ecoefficiency是很多公司的目标,但PS和GC两个人认为,仅仅采用这个ecoefficiency会带来很多不好的效果。后面的内容都在着重讲有哪些不好的效果,那为什么e不对呢?在考场上是不是因为e比c有更多的细节所以就出错概率小一些,同时如果从本质去理解这个选项是不是failure to understand the economic impact这里出了问题呢?

解答:

点赞0
阅读756
解答: 张慧雯老师

提问:

为什么这题不能选A呢?文章一开始不是说了Ecoefficiency的好处,然后就开始讲述它可能产生的不好的效果嘛?麻烦老师解答,谢谢!

解答:

点赞1
阅读1943
解答: 张慧雯老师

提问:

文章逻辑没搞明白,通篇都是一个方向的吗

解答:

点赞0
阅读1970
解答: sysadmin老师

提问:

他在文章最后就是提出了另一中方法啊

解答:

点赞0
阅读1936
解答: sysadmin老师

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询