还没有登录哦!

[Critical Reasoning]

试题详情

题目:

In the nation of Partoria, large trucks currently account for 6 percent of miles driven on Partoria's roads but are involved in 12 percent of all highway fatalities.  The very largest trucks—those with three trailers—had less than a third of the accident rate of single-and double-trailer trucks.  Clearly, therefore, one way for Partoria to reduce highway deaths would be to require shippers to increase their use of triple-trailer trucks.
 
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

选项:

A、Partorian trucking companies have so far used triple-trailer trucks on lightly traveled sections of major highways only.
B、No matter what changes Partoria makes in the regulation of trucking, it will have to keep some smaller roads off-limits to all large trucks.
C、Very few fatal collisions involving trucks in Partoria are collisions between two trucks.
D、In Partoria, the safety record of the trucking industry as a whole has improved slightly over the past ten years.
E、In Partoria, the maximum legal payload of a triple-trailer truck is less than three times the maximum legal payload of the largest of the single-trailer trucks.

答案:

A

提问:

想向老师请教这题的A选项,它是说这个车目前只在某些highway上用,没说以后不能用,那以后提高这个车的使用不就能降低死亡率了?为什么能weaken原文呢?我看到so far就把A选项排掉了,请老师指正我的思路。

解答:

点赞1
阅读2655
解答: 英吉

提问:

想向老师请教这题的A选项,它是说这个车目前只在某些highway上用,没说以后不能用,那以后提高这个车的使用不就能降低死亡率了?为什么能weaken原文呢?我看到so far就把A选项排掉了,请老师指正我的思路。

解答:

点赞1
阅读2656
解答: 英吉老师

提问:

A和B比较 不知道A比B好在哪里。 B说的是一些小路禁止大卡车,而原文说的是需要更多大卡车。我认为可以weaken原文。 请老师讲一下。

解答:

点赞0
阅读2726
解答: sysadmin老师

提问:

A/C比较... 首先排除DE然后是B,AC比较时就错了...

解答:

点赞0
阅读2647
解答: sysadmin老师

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询