还没有登录哦！
[Critical Reasoning]
试题详情
文章：
Until now, only injectable vaccines against influenza have been available. They have been used primarily by older adults, who are at risk for complications from influenza. A new vaccine administered in a nasal spray has proven effective in preventing influenza in children. Since children are significantly more likely than adults to contract and spread influenza, making the new vaccine widely available for children will greatly reduce the spread of influenza across the population.
题目：
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
选项:
A、If a person receives both the injectable and the nasal-spray vaccine, the two vaccines do not interfere with each other.The new vaccine uses the same mechanism to ward off influenza as injectable vaccines do
B、Government subsidies have kept the injectable vaccine affordable for all older adults.
C、Of the older adults who contract influenza, relatively few contract it from children with influenza
D、Many parents would be more inclined to have their children vaccinated against influenza if the vaccination did not require an injection.
答案:
E
提问：
思路： 文中结论说由于孩子比大人更容易感染influenza， 新的给孩子打的预防针能可以大力度的减少病菌的传播。 问支持。A说的是就算是一个人接种了both疫苗，也不会产生反应。 因为我觉得聊的是推广这个疫苗会不会预防疾病的事情。那A也就是减少了一个注射疫苗的 出现accident的可能性，堵上了一个范反向结果的洞。很支持啊。 选了A。
E说的是 很多家长更会让孩子接种疫苗，如果疫苗不要求一个injection. 感觉这题上就没有聊这疫苗形势是打的还是怎么的。我当时直接排除了E 。 求老师解答 为啥E比A好。谢谢！
解答：
点赞-1
阅读1064
提问：
思路： 文中结论说由于孩子比大人更容易感染influenza， 新的给孩子打的预防针能可以大力度的减少病菌的传播。 问支持。A说的是就算是一个人接种了both疫苗，也不会产生反应。 因为我觉得聊的是推广这个疫苗会不会预防疾病的事情。那A也就是减少了一个注射疫苗的 出现accident的可能性，堵上了一个范反向结果的洞。很支持啊。 选了A。
E说的是 很多家长更会让孩子接种疫苗，如果疫苗不要求一个injection. 感觉这题上就没有聊这疫苗形势是打的还是怎么的。我当时直接排除了E 。 求老师解答 为啥E比A好。谢谢！
解答：
点赞-1
阅读1065
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
