还没有登录哦！
[Critical Reasoning]
试题详情
题目：
Newspaper editors should not allow reporters to write the headlines for their own stories. The reason for this is that, while the headlines that reporters themselves write are often clever, what typically makes them clever is that they allude to little-known information that is familiar to the reporter but that never appears explicitly in the story itself.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
选项:
A、The reporter who writes a story is usually better placed than the reporter's editor is to judge what the story's most newsworthy features are.
B、To write a headline that is clever, a person must have sufficient understanding of the story that the headline accompanies.
C、Most reporters rarely bother to find out how other reporters have written stories and headlines about the same events that they themselves have covered.
D、For virtually any story that a reporter writes, there are at least a few people who know more about the story's subject matter than does the reporter.
E、The kind of headlines that newspaper editors want are those that anyone who has read a reporter's story in its entirety will recognize as clever.
答案:
E
提问：
C，D怎么排除。E虽然大体能理解，但是第一次感觉选不出来。
C大部分记者很少去了解其他记者对同样的事件是怎么写的，所以如果其他人不是跟他一样的写法那就不太好。
D对每一个故事，至少都有一些人比记者知道的更多，如果记者只是暗指一些他熟悉的但是在文章中没有明显表达出来的内容，那这些比记者了解更多的人就能看得出来，这样就有人知道新闻报道就不太真实，所以不应该让这些记者写。
解答：
点赞0
阅读567
提问：
C，D怎么排除。E虽然大体能理解，但是第一次感觉选不出来。
C大部分记者很少去了解其他记者对同样的事件是怎么写的，所以如果其他人不是跟他一样的写法那就不太好。
D对每一个故事，至少都有一些人比记者知道的更多，如果记者只是暗指一些他熟悉的但是在文章中没有明显表达出来的内容，那这些比记者了解更多的人就能看得出来，这样就有人知道新闻报道就不太真实，所以不应该让这些记者写。
解答：
点赞0
阅读568
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
