还没有登录哦！
[Critical Reasoning]
试题详情
题目：
Yeasts capable of leavening bread are widespread, and in the many centuries during which the ancient Egyptians made only unleavened bread, such yeasts must frequently have been mixed into bread doughs accidentally. The Egyptians, however, did not discover leavened bread until about 3000 B.C. That discovery roughly coincided with the introduction of a wheat variety that was preferable to previous varieties because its edible kernel could be removed from the husk without first toasting the grain.
选项:
A、Even after the ancient Egyptians discovered leavened bread and the techniques for reliably producing it were well known, unleavened bread continued to be widely consumed.
B、Only when the Egyptians stopped the practice of toasting grain were their stone-lined grain-toasting pits available for baking bread.
C、Heating a wheat kernel destroys its gluten, a protein that must be present in order for yeast to leaven bread dough.
D、The new variety of wheat, which had a more delicate flavor because it was not toasted, was reserved for the consumption of high officials when it first began to be grown.
E、Because the husk of the new variety of wheat was more easily removed, flour made from it required less effort to produce.
答案:
C
提问：
E为什么不行？E提到了wheat， 提到了加工bread用的flour, 应该可以作为两者相关的evidence, 因为wheat更容易加工，导致制作bread更简单;加强了两个dvpment的关系啊
解答：
点赞0
阅读6592
提问：
E为什么不行？E提到了wheat， 提到了加工bread用的flour, 应该可以作为两者相关的evidence, 因为wheat更容易加工，导致制作bread更简单;加强了两个dvpment的关系啊
解答：
点赞0
阅读6593
提问：
测试一下
解答：
点赞-1
阅读6618
提问：
没看懂原文
解答：
点赞0
阅读6672
提问：
为什么a不可以
解答：
点赞0
阅读6628
提问：
并没有怎么看懂，逻辑及其混乱，麻烦老师帮看一下，谢谢
解答：
点赞-1
阅读6624
提问：
这道题我是这样想的：题目问的是支持一个证据证明两个事件是因果联系的，那么读题，这两个事件是：L面包发现与一种wheat的引进之间的关系，是因为新的wheat中kernel可以去除且不用第一次toast。然后读题
A.即使之后E发现了L面包，且技术具有可行性，uL面包还是广泛消费，这个是无关的选项
B.说只有当人们停止toast，才可以做面包，这个绝对化，且属于无关选项
C.加热损害他的g,这个g可以做L面包,我觉得具有相关性,先保留
D.新品种更好什么的,这个无关
E.说的是这个新品种的壳更好的去除,面粉可以更好的省力,我觉得这个也具有相关性
在CE之间我选了E 求老师指点
解答：
点赞0
阅读6575
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
