还没有登录哦！
[Critical Reasoning]
试题详情
文章：
Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward. Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently.
题目：
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer’s argument?
选项:
A、The quality of original carpentry in hotels is generally far superior to the quality of original carpentry in other structures, such as houses and stores.Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930.
B、The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were not signifi cantly different in quality from the materials available to carpenters working after 1930.
C、The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and be demolished.
D、The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined signifi cantly since 1930
答案:
D
提问：
B为什么不对呢？1930年以后的酒店能承载更多的人，证明1930年以后的质量更好，不就说明1930年以前木工做的没有那么skill和care吗？
解答：
点赞0
阅读1809
提问：
B为什么不对呢？1930年以后的酒店能承载更多的人，证明1930年以后的质量更好，不就说明1930年以前木工做的没有那么skill和care吗？
解答：
点赞0
阅读1810
提问：
酒店里1930年之前built的carpentry要比1930年之后built当然质量要好，所以，former的手工质量和effort比之后的要优秀。D选项说原始的质量越好，building to 消失的likely越less？（请指导）
解答：
点赞3
阅读1858
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
