还没有登录哦!

[Sentence Correction]

试题详情

题目:

Although improved efficiency in converting harvested trees into wood products
may reduce harvest rates, it will stimulate demand by increasing supply and
lowering prices, thereby boosting consumption.

选项:

A、in converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest rates, it will stimulate demand by increasing supply and lowering prices, thereby boosting.
B、In converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest rates, demand will be stimulated because of increasing supply and lowering prices, which boost.
C、Of converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest  rates, it will stimulate demand by increasing supply and lowering prices, which boosts.
D、Of harvested trees being converted into wood products may reduce harvest rates, it will stimulate demand, because it will increase supply and lower prices, thereby boosting.
E、When harvested trees are converted into wood products may reduce harvest rates, demand will be stimulated because of increasing supply and lowering prices, which boost.

答案:

A

提问:

错选了B,听以前的录音说是B,题库答案给的A… 到底选A还是B……

解答:

点赞0
阅读16997
解答: 金栩竹

提问:

这道题答案选b吗?it 在gmat中能指代句子吗?

解答:

点赞1
阅读16739
解答: 金栩竹老师

提问:

不理解答案A。我觉得A里的it指代是不对的。应该是improved efficiency in converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest rate整件事stimulate demand xxxx吧?it怎么能指代事情呢?只能指代名词阿。 如果说B错在which歧义我也不太理解,which修饰的是lower prices有什么问题吗?

解答:

点赞0
阅读16807
解答: 金栩竹老师

提问:

A和B是不是就是语意的区别A 是efficiency 刺激需求,增长消费。b 需求因为低价和高产被刺激起来。低价高产促进消费。没有语法上的区别点了吗?我错选了b

解答:

点赞1
阅读16934
解答: 金栩竹老师

提问:

错选了B,听以前的录音说是B,题库答案给的A… 到底选A还是B……

解答:

点赞0
阅读16998
解答: 金栩竹老师

提问:

想问,如果主从连词,比如although,since引导从句,后面主句的主语,需要尽可能和从句主语保持一致?比如a和b的区别,如果b选项没有because of这个问题的话,a是否依然更优

解答:

点赞0
阅读16901
解答: 金栩竹老师

提问:

这道题在AB之间纠结,有说选A有说选B答案感觉不固定,请问老师能不能给个确切答案和确切解释,我选A因为it明显指代efficiency, boosting修饰前面it整句话,B的because of不好并且B用了被动感觉会胜率主语

解答:

点赞0
阅读16870
解答: 金栩竹老师

提问:

when 没有in,of好,排除E;D中的Being多余;converted直接被动语态可以修饰trees;boost应该修饰prices单复数排除C;但如果修饰demand则为单数排除B;但如果increasing, lowering, boosting均平行;则排除BC;选A;语义我不知道是否需要3个平行。我不太清楚如果这种情况下 感觉语义都可以 应该怎么处理。 (之前我也问了金老师类似语义区分。我认为runners of horses可以/老师说没有human runners of horses 这种表达。大概也是我语义不明。我觉得无所谓都可以因为语义是清楚的 可能表达不准确。有没有什么文章/方法能提高?

解答:

点赞1
阅读16775
解答: 王文静老师

提问:

AB

解答:

点赞0
阅读16733
解答: 韩易老师

提问:

答案是B,错选了A。开始没有读出来A和B的stimulate demand的发起者不同,是根thereby boosting 和 which boost 做的判断,感觉应该是这整件事促进了消费,而不是B的prices促进消费,麻烦老师讲解。

解答:

点赞0
阅读16750
解答: sysadmin老师

提问:

不明白为什么A错了?

解答:

点赞0
阅读16767
解答: sysadmin老师

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询