还没有登录哦！
[Reading Comprehension]
试题详情
文章：
| Line | Jacob Burckhardt’s view that Renaissance |
| European women “stood on a footing of perfect | |
| equality” with Renaissance men has been repeatedly | |
| cited by feminist scholars as a prelude to their | |
| (5) | presentation of rich historical evidence of women’s |
| inequality. In striking contrast to Burckhardt, Joan | |
| Kelly in her famous 1977 essay, “Did Women Have | |
| a Renaissance?” argued that the Renaissance was | |
| a period of economic and social decline for women | |
| (10) | relative both to Renaissance men and to medieval |
| women. Recently, however, a significant trend | |
| among feminist scholars has entailed a rejection | |
| of both Kelly’s dark vision of the Renaissance and | |
| Burckhardt’s rosy one. Many recent works by these | |
| (15) | scholars stress the ways in which differences |
| among Renaissance women—especially in terms | |
| of social status and religion—work to complicate | |
| the kinds of generalizations both Burckhardt and | |
| Kelly made on the basis of their observations about | |
| (20) | upper-class Italian women. |
| The trend is also evident, however, in works | |
| focusing on those middle- and upper-class | |
| European women whose ability to write gives them | |
| disproportionate representation in the historical | |
| (25) | record. Such women were, simply by virtue of |
| their literacy, members of a tiny minority of the | |
| population, so it is risky to take their descriptions of | |
| their experiences as typical of “female experience” | |
| in any general sense. Tina Krontiris, for example, in | |
| (30) | her fascinating study of six Renaissance women |
| writers, does tend at times to conflate “women” and | |
| “women writers,” assuming that women’s gender, | |
| irrespective of other social differences, including | |
| literacy, allows us to view women as a homogeneous | |
| (35) | social group and make that group an object of |
| analysis. Nonetheless, Krontiris makes a significant | |
| contribution to the field and is representative of | |
| those authors who offer what might be called a | |
| cautiously optimistic assessment of Renaissance | |
| (40) | women’s achievements, although she also stresses |
| the social obstacles Renaissance women faced | |
| when they sought to raise their “oppositional | |
| voices.” Krontiris is concerned to show women | |
| intentionally negotiating some power for themselves | |
| (45) | (at least in the realm of public discourse) against |
| potentially constraining ideologies, but in her sober | |
| and thoughtful concluding remarks, she suggests | |
| that such verbal opposition to cultural stereotypes | |
| was highly circumscribed; women seldom attacked | |
| (50) | the basic assumptions in the ideologies that |
| oppressed them. |
题目：
According to the passage, Krontiris’s work differs from that of the scholars mentioned in line 12 in which of the following ways?
选项:
A、Krontiris’s work stresses the achievements of Renaissance women rather than the obstacles to their success.
B、Krontiris’s work is based on a reinterpretation of the work of earlier scholars.
C、Krontiris’s views are at odds with those of both Kelly and Burkhardt.
D、Krontiris’s work focuses on the place of women in Renaissance society.
E、Krontiris’s views are based exclusively on the study of a privileged group of women.
答案:
E
提问：
我听了已有录音的还是不明白，我感觉也许是我对文章的逻辑理解有问题。我理解的这篇文章说的是，先引出JB和JK两个极端观点，然后说最近出现了一种趋势，就是学者们不同意这两人观点，因为这两人没考虑到那时女性不同的身份等各种不同，而就对上层的印第安女人做了研究就得出了结论。但是，这群学者自己也只是把重点放在中上层女性身上，（就是第二段第一句，这里的the trend 难道不是说的这群学者吗？）因为这群女性有文化会写东西blabla。举个例子，Tina 这个人就是，写来写去其实写的是有文化的女人blabla。 我理解的不对吗？很费解了
解答：
点赞1
阅读9324
提问：
老师这道题看了其他同学问题的回答我还是不懂，我看出来的是TK主要研究的是6个女性作家，可是6个女性作家怎么和privilege 联系到一起去了，我这道题本来想选E但是看到这个词我又很迷茫，因为我觉得这个词是指的upper class也就是JB和JK研究的group。
解答：
点赞2
阅读8691
提问：
读完文章以后感觉kr和女学者的关系比较晕。能帮忙解释一下他们的观点相同和不同在哪么？怎么读出来的？谢谢！
解答：
点赞0
阅读9017
提问：
我读出来了K和Femanist是同属一个trend下面的不同观点，都是反驳B和kelly，为啥不选C？
解答：
点赞1
阅读9062
提问：
我之前提问过，虽然明白了，这道题是因为K的观点算是最近这个trend里面的一个转折，下面说的只关注中上层欧洲女性的和上面那些学者不是一群人。但我过了一段时间再看这题，发现我还是很难看出这里表示的是同一个trend里有两派观点，有什么词或者句意能表现吗？这种类型的转折要怎么去辨认呀？如果没看题的话，我肯定会默认K就是这群学者中的一个例子。the trend is also evident in works focusing这句话 怎么看都是在说上面的那群学者的trend呀
解答：
点赞1
阅读9123
提问：
我听了已有录音的还是不明白，我感觉也许是我对文章的逻辑理解有问题。我理解的这篇文章说的是，先引出JB和JK两个极端观点，然后说最近出现了一种趋势，就是学者们不同意这两人观点，因为这两人没考虑到那时女性不同的身份等各种不同，而就对上层的印第安女人做了研究就得出了结论。但是，这群学者自己也只是把重点放在中上层女性身上，（就是第二段第一句，这里的the trend 难道不是说的这群学者吗？）因为这群女性有文化会写东西blabla。举个例子，Tina 这个人就是，写来写去其实写的是有文化的女人blabla。 我理解的不对吗？很费解了
解答：
点赞1
阅读9325
提问：
这道题的逻辑没有懂 而且E选项exclusively的意思是“唯一的、只研究这个” 还是 “除了这个、排他的”
解答：
点赞0
阅读9203
提问：
sorry，Tina老师，刚才把问题放错位置了。想问的是这道题。听了录音感觉讲的还是不清楚，想问Tina老师，K不就是这些scholars中的一个例子吗？怎么再找他们的不同呢？而且第二段第一句话也说了，这个trend focus的是上层和中产女性，不也是只关注了特定的一个group吗？K研究的是女作家，也是一个特定的group，这不是区别呀。谢谢老师
解答：
点赞1
阅读9083
提问：
我想问一下Krontiris是 Feminist scholars 的一个代表，他们两者的观点不应该是一致的吗。这道题应该怎么样定位？定位在哪呢 谢谢老师
解答：
点赞0
阅读9116
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
