还没有登录哦!

[Reading Comprehension]

试题详情

文章:

Line         It is an odd but indisputable fact that the
  seventeenth-century English women who are
  generally regarded as among the forerunners of
  modern feminism are almost all identified with the
(5) Royalist side in the conflict between Royalists and
  Parliamentarians known as the English Civil Wars.
  Since Royalist ideology is often associated with the
  radical patriarchalism of seventeenth-century
  political theorist Robert Filmer—a patriarchalism
(10) that equates family and kingdom and asserts the
  divinely ordained absolute power of the king and,
  by analogy, of the male head of the household—
  historians have been understandably puzzled by the
  fact that Royalist women wrote the earliest
(15) extended criticisms of the absolute subordination
  of women in marriage and the earliest systematic
  assertions of women’s rational and moral equality
  with men. Some historians have questioned the
  facile equation of Royalist ideology with Filmerian
(20) patriarchalism; and indeed, there may have been
  no consistent differences between Royalists and
  Parliamentarians on issues of family organization
  and women’s political rights, but in that case one
  would expect early feminists to be equally divided
(25) between the two sides.
       Catherine Gallagher argues that Royalism
  engendered feminism because the ideology of
  absolute monarchy provided a transition to an
  ideology of the absolute self. She cites the example
(30) of the notoriously eccentric author Margaret
  Cavendish (1626–1673), duchess of Newcastle.
  Cavendish claimed to be as ambitious as any
  woman could be, but knowing that as a woman she
  was excluded from the pursuit of power in the real
(35) world, she resolved to be mistress of her own
  world, the “immaterial world” that any person can
  create within her own mind—and, as a writer, on
  paper. In proclaiming what she called her
  “singularity,” Cavendish insisted that she was a
(40) self-sufficient being within her mental empire, the
  center of her own subjective universe rather than a
  satellite orbiting a dominant male planet. In
  justifying this absolute singularity, Cavendish
  repeatedly invoked the model of the absolute
(45) monarch, a figure that became a metaphor for the
  self-enclosed, autonomous nature of the individual
  person. Cavendish’s successors among early
  feminists retained her notion of woman’s sovereign
  self, but they also sought to break free from the
(50) complete political and social isolation that her
  absolute singularity entailed.


题目:

The primary purpose of the passage is to

选项:

A、trace the historical roots of a modern sociopolitical movement
B、present one scholar’s explanation for a puzzling historical phenomenon
C、contrast two interpretations of the ideological origins of a political conflict
D、establish a link between the ideology of an influential political theorist and that of a notoriously eccentric writer
E、call attention to some points of agreement between opposing sides in an ideological debate

答案:

B

提问:

跪求张慧雯老师讲一下这篇文章的脉络ಥ_ಥ

解答:

点赞1
阅读1809
解答: 张慧雯

提问:

请问为什么不能选b,全文不是在比较r与p的关系吗?

解答:

点赞0
阅读1703
解答: 张慧雯老师

提问:

请英吉老师回答下~这道阅读题(在下面图片上,是阅读的最后一题,答疑器没找到)如果按照逻辑题的方法来看,题目中问的是link在Royalism和feminism,看选项,只有C同时提到了R和f从而选C。不知道这样在阅读当中能不能行的通?

解答:

点赞0
阅读1759
解答: 英吉老师

提问:

跪求张慧雯老师讲一下这篇文章的脉络ಥ_ಥ

解答:

点赞1
阅读1810
解答: 张慧雯老师

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询