还没有登录哦！
[Critical Reasoning]
试题详情
题目：
Vargonia has just introduced a legal requirement that student-teacher ratios in government-funded schools not exceed a certain limit. All Vargonian children are entitled to education, free of charge, in these schools. When a recession occurs and average incomes fall, the number of children enrolled in government-funded schools tends to increase. Therefore, though most employment opportunities contract in economic recessions, getting a teaching job in Vargonia’s government-funded schools will not be made more difficult by a recession.
Which of the following would be most important to determine in order to evaluate the argument?
Which of the following would be most important to determine in order to evaluate the argument?
选项:
A、Whether in Vargonia there are any schools not funded by the government that offer children an education free of charge
B、Whether the number of qualified applicants for teaching positions in government-funded schools increases significantly during economic recessions
C、What the current student-teacher ratio in Vargonia’s government-funded schools is
D、What proportion of Vargonia’s workers currently hold jobs as teachers in government-funded schools
E、Whether in the past a number of government-funded schools in Vargonia have had student-teacher ratios well in excess of the new limit
答案:
B
提问：
老师这道题我选对了，可是不知道CD错在哪里，您可以帮我讲讲吗
解答：
点赞0
阅读2028
提问：
老师这道题我选对了，可是不知道CD错在哪里，您可以帮我讲讲吗
解答：
点赞0
阅读2029
提问：
这道题选对了B，想问一下，评价题针对原文哪一部分进行评价，像是支持和驳斥题对原文reasoning或conclusion进行演绎推理，评价题从正反两个方面去评价原文所以选项的设置一般是whether句或者是一般疑问句，如果碰到特殊疑问句的选项是不是可以直接排除，如果不能该怎么考虑这种特殊疑问句像这题的CD选项，还一个就是对于原文的background，reasoning和conclusion怎么具体划分，对于原文只有三句话可以划分得出来以及结论中带有特殊引导结论的词可以知道是结论，可是复杂一点的原文那三个点没有分得太清，尤其是background和reasoning的区分
解答：
点赞0
阅读1893
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
