还没有登录哦!

[Reading Comprehension]

试题详情

文章:

Line         Jon Clark’s study of the effect of the modernization
  of a telephone exchange on exchange maintenance
  work and workers is a solid contribution to a debate
  that encompasses two lively issues in the history and
(5) sociology of technology: technological determinism
  and social constructivism.
       Clark makes the point that the characteristics of a
  technology have a decisive influence on job skills and
  work organization. Put more strongly, technology can
(10) be a primary determinant of social and managerial
  organization. Clark believes this possibility has
  been obscured by the recent sociological fashion,
  exemplified by Braverman’s analysis, that emphasizes
  the way machinery reflects social choices. For
(15) Braverman, the shape of a technological system is
  subordinate to the manager’s desire to wrest control
  of the labor process from the workers. Technological
  change is construed as the outcome of negotiations
  among interested parties who seek to incorporate
(20) their own interests into the design and configuration
  of the machinery. This position represents the new
  mainstream called social constructivism.
       The constructivists gain acceptance by
  misrepresenting technological determinism:
(25) technological determinists are supposed to believe,
  for example, that machinery imposes appropriate
  forms of order on society. The alternative to
  constructivism, in other words, is to view technology
  as existing outside society, capable of directly
(30) influencing skills and work organization.
       Clark refutes the extremes of the constructivists
  by both theoretical and empirical arguments.
  Theoretically he defines “technology” in terms of
  relationships between social and technical variables.
(35) Attempts to reduce the meaning of technology to
  cold, hard metal are bound to fail, for machinery is
  just scrap unless it is organized functionally and
  supported by appropriate systems of operation and
  maintenance. At the empirical level Clark shows how
(40) a change at the telephone exchange from
  maintenance-intensive electromechanical switches
  to semielectronic switching systems altered work
  tasks, skills, training opportunities, administration,
  and organization of workers. Some changes Clark
(45) attributes to the particular way management and
  labor unions negotiated the introduction of the
  technology, whereas others are seen as arising from
  the capabilities and nature of the technology itself.
  Thus Clark helps answer the question: “When is
(50) social choice decisive and when are the concrete
  characteristics of technology more important?”


题目:

Which of the following statements about Clark’s study of the telephone exchange can be inferred from information in the passage?

选项:

A、Clark’s reason for undertaking the study was to undermine Braverman’s analysis of the function of technology.
B、Clark’s study suggests that the implementation of technology should be discussed in the context of conflict between labor and management.
C、Clark examined the impact of changes in the technology of switching at the exchange in terms of overall operations and organization.
D、Clark concluded that the implementation of new switching technology was equally beneficial to management and labor.
E、Clark’s analysis of the change in switching systems applies only narrowly to the situation at the particular exchange that he studied.

答案:

C

提问:

怎么根据文章逻辑选出的C选项?这种infer,imply的题是只根据文章逻辑走向做?还是要根据题目稍微定下位再根据逻辑去做?

解答:

点赞0
阅读3593
解答: 郭培月

提问:

老师,我现在有一个很大的问题,对于文章的逻辑框架读的懂,跟老师视频讲解一样,定位正确,其余三个错误选项秒排,可是选到两个相似的选项(特别是infer题)总是很纠结而且在时间的紧迫下选了错的选项,这个问题应该怎么解决。还有我应该怎么去提升

解答:

点赞0
阅读3655
解答: 郭培月老师

提问:

老师,我现在有一个很大的问题,对于文章的逻辑框架读的懂,跟老师视频讲解一样,定位正确,其余三个错误选项秒排,可是选到两个相似的选项(特别是infer题)总是很纠结而且在时间的紧迫下选了错的选项,这个问题应该怎么解决。还有我应该怎么去提升

解答:

点赞0
阅读3689
解答: 郭培月老师

提问:

怎么根据文章逻辑选出的C选项?这种infer,imply的题是只根据文章逻辑走向做?还是要根据题目稍微定下位再根据逻辑去做?

解答:

点赞0
阅读3594
解答: 郭培月老师

提问:

题干问的是:克拉克研究电话交换这个事儿在文中提到,由此可以看出什么?那我就要围绕电话交换机研究这件事情,就要在第二段段首对应答案C。对吗?但我当时错误选A是带着对全文的一种感情判断的,既然主旋律都是在歌颂Clark的对科技的态度,那做研究的目的就是undermine对立一派B这帮人代表的观点的。请老师帮我看一下逻辑的漏洞在哪里谢谢。您可以语音解答,清楚即可。谢谢

解答:

点赞0
阅读3632
解答: 王文静老师

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询