还没有登录哦!

[Critical Reasoning]

试题详情

题目:

Which of the following most logically completes the passage?

A recent government study links the high rates of respiratory ailments in Groverston to airborne pollutants released by the Woodco plywood manufacturing plant there. To address the problem, the government imposed strict regulations on emissions which will go into effect in four years. Although Woodco plans to cut its emissions in half two years ahead of schedule, it is unlikely that the rate of respiratory ailments will decline before the regulations go into effect, since ________.

选项:

A、the number of facilities capable of treating respiratory ailments is not likely to increase
B、reducing emissions even further than planned would necessitate decreasing production at Woodco
C、it is difficult to make accurate, long-term predictions about emissions
D、not all respiratory ailments are caused by airborne pollutants
E、three new plywood manufacturing plants are about to go into production in Groverston

答案:

E

提问:

老师 这道题选了d 能不能讲一下为什么选e 谢谢

解答:

点赞0
阅读8467
解答: 金栩竹

提问:

@唐瑭老师,想听一下唐老师对于这题的解题思路,想用唐老师的只看前半句就解题大法,但是自己没有思路,谢谢老师

解答:

点赞0
阅读8406
解答: 唐瑭老师

提问:

老师,这道题他说了总体减少一半的排放,也没说是减少单个plant的排放,所以即使多加了三个plant,不能影响公司打算减少一半污染的计划啊

解答:

点赞0
阅读8425
解答: haiwang@boost.org.cn老师

提问:

老师,这道题他说了总体减少一半的排放,也没说是减少单个plant的排放,所以即使多加了三个plant,不能影响公司打算减少一半污染的计划啊

解答:

点赞0
阅读8411
解答: haiwang@boost.org.cn老师

提问:

请问选项B是什么意思?没看懂B选项。

解答:

点赞1
阅读8586
解答: 胡凡老师

提问:

老师,我错选了D选项。原文说削减了排放污染反而没有下降,D表达的意思是respiratory ailment 除了airborne pollutants 还有其他的原因。如果其他的原因导致的污染物增多,且其增多的量比法规削减的airborne pollutants 多,总的污染不是会增加吗?所以即使削减了排放反而污染物不可能下降。请问D错在哪里呢?

解答:

点赞1
阅读8638
解答: 胡凡老师

提问:

解答:

点赞0
阅读8456
解答: 郭培月老师

提问:

老师 这道题选了d 能不能讲一下为什么选e 谢谢

解答:

点赞0
阅读8468
解答: 金栩竹老师

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询