还没有登录哦！
[Critical Reasoning]
试题详情
题目：
Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools as cleaners or pesticides causes allergic reactions in some children. Elementary school nurses in Renston report that the proportion of schoolchildren sent to them for treatment of allergic reactions to those chemicals has increased significantly over the past ten years. Therefore, either Renston’s schoolchildren have been exposed to greater quantities of the chemicals, or they are more sensitive to them than schoolchildren were ten years ago.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
选项:
A、The number of school nurses employed by Renston’s elementary schools has not decreased over the past ten years.
B、Children who are allergic to the chemicals are no more likely than other children to have allergies to other substances.
C、Children who have allergic reactions to the chemicals are not more likely to be sent to a school nurse now than they were ten years ago.
D、The chemicals are not commonly used as cleaners or pesticides in houses and apartment buildings in Renston.
E、Children attending elementary school do not make up a larger proportion of Renston’s population now than they did ten years ago.
答案:
C
提问：
清洁剂杀虫剂让暴露于这些化学制剂的儿童产生过敏反应。校医称因过敏症状送交他们的儿童人数在过去十年里激增。因此结论是，要么就是这些孩子接触的化学成分量增多了，要么就是这些孩子比十年前的孩子娇气。以下哪个假设可支持原文。错选B。我是逻辑链没打准，请老师协助梳理一下 谢谢
解答：
点赞0
阅读459
提问：
清洁剂杀虫剂让暴露于这些化学制剂的儿童产生过敏反应。校医称因过敏症状送交他们的儿童人数在过去十年里激增。因此结论是，要么就是这些孩子接触的化学成分量增多了，要么就是这些孩子比十年前的孩子娇气。以下哪个假设可支持原文。错选B。我是逻辑链没打准，请老师协助梳理一下 谢谢
解答：
点赞0
阅读460
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
