还没有登录哦！
[Critical Reasoning]
试题详情
题目：
Community activist: If Morganville wants to keep its central shopping district healthy, it should prevent the opening of a huge SaveAll discount department store on the outskirts of Morganville. Records from other small towns show that whenever SaveAll has opened a store outside the central shopping district of a small town, within five years the town has experienced the bankruptcies of more than a quarter of the stores in the shopping district.
The answer to which of the following would be most useful for evaluating the community activist's reasoning?
选项:
A、Have community activists in other towns successfully campaigned against the opening of a SaveAll store on the outskirts of their towns?
B、Do a large percentage of the residents of Morganville currently do almost all of their shopping at stores in Morganville?
C、In towns with healthy central shopping districts, what proportion of the stores in those districts suffer bankruptcy during a typical five-year period?
D、What proportion of the employees at the SaveAll store on the outskirts of Morganville will be drawn form Morganville?
E、Do newly opened SaveAll stores ever lose money during their first five years of operation?
答案:
C
提问：
老师这道题我拎的逻辑链：要想保持购物中心healthy，就别开SaveAll打折店；因为最近周边的经验表示这家店比较晦气，五年内有好多店都给带黄了。
为了更好地评价这个reasoning，（可以理解为找出合理评价这个推理的假设前提，可以吧？）我需要知道“就是他导致别人都黄了，没有其他原因”。所以C就要排一排他因。您看我这么推对么。因为碰到新的题目还有时候将合理推断与脑补信息分的不是太清楚，有关和无关信息判断的链条会与正确答案想要的有偏差，还请老师指点一下，谢谢啦！
解答：
点赞0
阅读10454
提问：
听录播课时老师说C答案的逻辑是如果健康地区的破产率达到四分之一,则M地区还是很健康的,推翻了原文的结论。可是原文的主题是问M地区是否健康吗？难道不是问Save all discount department对stores 的影响吗？
解答：
点赞0
阅读10574
提问：
评价题不是从正反两个方面都可以去影响原文，C选项不是问你它的比例吗，特殊疑问句让回答具体内容，怎么从正反去回答？
解答：
点赞0
阅读10474
提问：
老师请问我可不可以这么理解。所有这种the following would be most useful for evaluating the argument的类型的题。我要找出那个最能挑战argument的答案。就是找出另一个可以影响argument的因素。比如说这个题，关于说商店破产的问题。c选项题的这个问题。如果回答yes，就会选削弱argument 如果回答no，就不能对argument造成影响。
解答：
点赞0
阅读10451
提问：
老师这道题我拎的逻辑链：要想保持购物中心healthy，就别开SaveAll打折店；因为最近周边的经验表示这家店比较晦气，五年内有好多店都给带黄了。
为了更好地评价这个reasoning，（可以理解为找出合理评价这个推理的假设前提，可以吧？）我需要知道“就是他导致别人都黄了，没有其他原因”。所以C就要排一排他因。您看我这么推对么。因为碰到新的题目还有时候将合理推断与脑补信息分的不是太清楚，有关和无关信息判断的链条会与正确答案想要的有偏差，还请老师指点一下，谢谢啦！
解答：
点赞0
阅读10455
提问：
B选项为什么不对呢？回答yes和no 能支持和反驳啊
解答：
点赞0
阅读10448
提问：
B选项为什么不对呢？C是怎么判断的？
解答：
点赞0
阅读10447
提问：
此题没听懂录音。 我选的D。我觉得D是。我觉得这是moral的原因。C看着也对，financial的原因。
Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentration on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material. Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?
A. The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.
B. Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.
C. The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.
D. People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence.
E. It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.
解答：
点赞0
阅读10446
提问：
我错选了B，当时不太看得懂C这个答案，请老师讲解。
解答：
点赞0
阅读10439
提问：
把正确答案C杀了，觉得in towns with healthy central shopping districts超出了范围，没想通，请老师讲讲，谢谢！
解答：
点赞0
阅读10463
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
