还没有登录哦!

[Reading Comprehension]

试题详情

文章:

    In mid-February 1917 a women's movement independent of political affiliation erupted in Line New York City, the stronghold of the Socialist party in the United states. Protesting against the high cost of living, thousands of women refused to buy chickens, fish, and vegetables. The boycott shut down much of the City's foodstuffs marketing for two weeks, riveting public attention on the issue of food prices, which had increased partly as a result of increased exports of food to Europe that had been occurring since the outbreak of the First World War.

    By early 1917 the Socialist party had established itself as a major political presence in New York City. New York Socialists, whose customary spheres of struggle were electoral work and trade union organizing, seized the opportunity and quickly organized an extensive series of cost-of-living protests designed to direct the women's movement toward Socialist goals. Underneath the Socialists' brief commitment to cost-of-living organizing lay a basic indifference to the issue itself. While some Socialists did view price protests as a direct step toward socialism, most Socialists ultimately sought to divert the cost-of-living movement into alternative channels of protest. Union organizing, they argued, was the best method through which to combat the high cost of living. For others, cost-of-living or oganizing was valuable insofar as it led women into the struggle for suffrage, and similarly, the suffrage struggle was valuable insofar as it moved United States society one step closer to socialism.

    Although New York's Socialists saw the cost-of-living issue as, at best ,secondary or tertiary to the real task at hand, the boycotters, by sharp contrast, joined the price protest movement out of an urgent and deeply felt commitment to the cost-of-living issue. A shared experience of swiftly declining living standards caused by rising food prices drove these women to protest. Consumer organizing spoke directly to their daily lives and concerns; they saw cheaper food as a valuable end in itself. Food price protests were these women's way of organizing at their own workplace, as workers whose occupation was shopping and preparing food for their families.

题目:

Which of the following best states the function of the passage as a whole?

选项:

A、To contrast the views held by the Socialist party and by the boycotting women of New York City on the cost-of-living issue
B、To analyze the assumptions underlying oppos-ing viewpoints within the New York Socialist party of 1917
C、To provide a historical perspective on different approaches to the resolution of the cost-of-living issue.
D、To chronicle the sequence of events that led to the New York Socialist party's emergence as a political power
E、To analyze the motivations behind the Socialist party's involvement in the women's suffrage movement.

答案:

C

提问:

完全不知道这个文章讲的是什么

解答:

点赞0
阅读3385
解答: 王文静

提问:

请问慧雯老师,如何在选项A和C之间做选择,我纠结了很久,我看到C选项中用了’a historical perspective’说提到了一个历史观点,但读了文章通篇说了socialist和抗议的女人们分别是如何看待抵抗高物价这件事的,所以将C就排除了。

解答:

点赞0
阅读3338
解答: 张慧雯老师

提问:

完全不知道这个文章讲的是什么

解答:

点赞0
阅读3386
解答: 王文静老师

提问:

一开始选E 后来改错的时候发现 当时之所以选E 是因为 把分论点 当成总论点了 但是,再做的时候就觉得A 能够总结全文的论点 所以想选A 但是答案 说是C 听了录音,就说C 错的可能性最小 但是我认为C To provide a historical perspective on different approaches to the resolution of the cost-of-living issue. 提供历史的观点在不同的方法上 去解决cost-of-living issue 我觉得原文一直在说女性和 社会主义者 在cost-of-living上的动机 并没有解决cost-living-issue 也没有提到不同的方法啊? 讨论的范围上出现偏差,怎么能算是错误的可能性最小呢???

解答:

点赞2
阅读3333
解答: sysadmin老师

提问:

A/C如何比?

解答:

点赞-1
阅读3354
解答: sysadmin老师

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询