还没有登录哦!

[Reading Comprehension]

试题详情

文章:

    In 1994, a team of scientists led by David Mckay began studying the meteorite ALH84001, which had been discovered in Antarctica in 1984. Two years later, the McKay team announced that ALH84001, which scientists generally agree originated on Mars, contained compelling evidence that life once existed on Mars. This evidence includes the discovery of organic molecules in ALH84001,the first ever found in Martian rock. Organic molecules-complex, carbon based compounds-form the basis for terrestrial life. The organic molecules found in ALH84001 are polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, or PAH's. When microbes die, their organic material often decays into PAH's.

    Skepticism about the McKay team's claim remains, however. For example,ALH84001 has been on earth for 13,000 years, suggesting to some scientists that its PAH's might have resulted from terrestrial contamination. However, McKay's team has demonstrated that the concentration of PAH's increases as one looks deeper into ALH84001, contrary to what one would expect from terrestrial contamination. The skeptic's strongest argument, however, is that processes unrelated to organic life can easily produce all the evidence found by McKay' steam, including PAH's. For example, star formation produces PAH's. Moreover, PAH's frequently appear in other meteorites, and no one attributes their presence to life processes. Yet McKay's team notes that the particular combination of PAH's in ALH84001 is more similar to the combinations produced by decaying organisms than to those originating form nonbiological processes.

题目:

The passage asserts which of the following about the claim that ALH84001 originated on Mars?

选项:

A、It was initially proposed by the McKay team of scientists.
B、It is not a matter of widespread scientific dispute.
C、It has been questioned by some skeptics of the McKay team's work.
D、It has been undermined by recent work on PAH's.
E、It is incompatible with the face that ALH84001 has been on Earth for 13,000 years.

答案:

B

提问:

麻烦老师讲讲为什么不选C呢?全文第二段不是讲了skepticism about the McKay team's work吗?skeptics质疑的不也是ALH是否起源火星的问题嘛!C选项哪里有问题,且B为什么会比好呢!我觉得B这个选项说的多恶心啊~~我第一个就把它排除了^_^

解答:

点赞0
阅读1657
解答: sysadmin

提问:

我觉得虽然原文中提到了generally agree,但是同时原文也提到了Skepticism about the McKay team's claim remains就在第二段的开头。所以想知道遇到这种问题的时候怎么能判断出来就是B而不是C

解答:

点赞0
阅读1652
解答: sysadmin老师

提问:

麻烦老师讲讲为什么不选C呢?全文第二段不是讲了skepticism about the McKay team's work吗?skeptics质疑的不也是ALH是否起源火星的问题嘛!C选项哪里有问题,且B为什么会比好呢!我觉得B这个选项说的多恶心啊~~我第一个就把它排除了^_^

解答:

点赞0
阅读1658
解答: sysadmin老师

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询