还没有登录哦！
[Critical Reasoning]
试题详情
题目：
Journalist: In physics journals, the number of articles reporting the results of experiments involving particle accelerators was lower last year than it had been in previous years. Several of the particle accelerators at major research institutions were out of service the year before last for repairs, so it is likely that the low number of articles was due to the decline in availability of particle accelerators.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the journalist's argument?
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the journalist's argument?
选项:
A、Every article based on experiments with particle accelerators that was submitted for publication last year actually was published.
B、The average time scientists must wait for access to a particle accelerator has declined over the last several years.
C、The number of physics journals was the same last year as in previous years.
D、Particle accelerators can be used for more than one group of experiments in any given year.
E、Recent changes in the editorial policies of several physics journals have decreased the likelihood that articles concerning particle-accelerator research will be accepted for publication.
答案:
E
提问：
其实我看每个选项都感觉不好，麻烦老师讲下思路，谢谢啦 （如果没到也麻烦老师讲下，谢谢啦）
解答：
点赞0
阅读7201
提问：
请老师解释一下B和D哪里有问题，属于英吉老师说的驳斥题错误答案中的哪一类？
解答：
点赞0
阅读7167
提问：
题目说 文章少的原因是因为机器不能用了。D说一台机器可以供很多组实验用，所以可以反驳不是机器少了的原因，为啥错？
解答：
点赞0
阅读7301
提问：
可以理解E 但是D为什么不可以 文中说一些pa坏了 D说pa可以用于不同的实验 也就是pa坏了的可以像其他实验组借嘛 那么就说明那么不就是削弱了文中文章少是由于没有pa造成的了吗？请老师讲解 谢谢
解答：
点赞0
阅读7325
提问：
选对了但是犹豫了B。原文最后一句话说可用的数量减少导致文章数量减少，不就是说用到这个加速器的机会少了吗？B说平均等待年限短了，不就是说用加速器的机会多吗？直接反驳结论阿。B错了是违反了哪个原则呢？
解答：
点赞0
阅读7210
提问：
B为什么不对？需等待的时间少了 particle accelerator多了 不是对原来argument的否定吗 原argument时说particle accelerator减少
解答：
点赞0
阅读7160
提问：
其实我看每个选项都感觉不好，麻烦老师讲下思路，谢谢啦 （如果没到也麻烦老师讲下，谢谢啦）
解答：
点赞0
阅读7202
提问：
老师，这题我错选了D.我是觉得既然是要驳斥particle accelerators引起文章数量减少，那么D中说它在多组实验中使用，那文章数量不一定会减少。请问如何停止这种发散？
解答：
点赞-3
阅读7221
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
