还没有登录哦!

[Reading Comprehension]

试题详情

文章:

Line         Ecoefficiency (measures to minimize environmental
  impact through the reduction or elimination of waste
  from production processes) has become a goal for
  companies worldwide, with many realizing significant
(5) cost savings from such innovations. Peter Senge and
  Goran Carstedt see this development as laudable
  but suggest that simply adopting ecoefficiency
  innovations could actually worsen environmental
  stresses in the future. Such innovations reduce
(10) production waste but do not alter the number of
  products manufactured nor the waste generated
  from their use and discard; indeed, most companies
  invest in ecoefficiency improvements in order to
  increase profits and growth. Moreover, there is no
(15) guarantee that increased economic growth from
  ecoefficiency will come in similarly ecoefficient
  ways, since in today’s global markets, greater profits
  may be turned into investment capital that could easily
  be reinvested in old-style eco-inefficient industries.
(20) Even a vastly more ecoefficient industrial system
  could, were it to grow much larger, generate more
  total waste and destroy more habitat and species
  than would a smaller, less ecoefficient economy.
  Senge and Carstedt argue that to preserve the global
(25) environment and sustain economic growth,
  businesses must develop a new systemic approach
  that reduces total material use and total accumulated
  waste. Focusing exclusively on ecoefficiency, which
  offers a compelling business case according to
(30) established thinking, may distract companies from
  pursuing radically different products and business
  models.


题目:

The passage implies that which of the following is a possible consequence of a company’s adoption of innovations that increase its ecoefficiency?

选项:

A、Company profits resulting from such innovations may be reinvested in that company with no guarantee that the company will continue to make further improvements in ecoefficiency.
B、Company growth fostered by cost savings from such innovations may allow that company to manufacture a greater number of products that will be used and discarded, thus worsening environmental stress.
C、A company that fails to realize significant cost savings from such innovations may have little incentive to continue to minimize the environmental impact of its production processes.
D、A company that comes to depend on such innovations to increase its profits and growth may be vulnerable in the global market to competition from old-style eco-inefficient industries.
E、A company that meets its ecoefficiency goals is unlikely to invest its increased profits in the development of new and innovative ecoefficiency measures.

答案:

B

提问:

老师,这道题我觉得A、B、E都很难排除,A和E说法比较类似,都是说企业在获得盈利之后就有可能抛弃ecoefficiency,我觉得原文确实是有这个意思的,为什么排除呢?麻烦老师解答~ (there is no guarantee that increased economic growth from ecoefficiency will come in similarly ecoefficient ways, since in today’s global markets, greater profits may be turned into investment capital that could easily be reinvested in old-style eco-inefficient industries.这句话感觉和AE都满贴近的)

解答:

点赞0
阅读941
解答: sysadmin

提问:

这题是imply,有可能读原文找不到答案,所以先根据比较选项和跳读到的内容,我只排除了C、E。但再定位到哪里找答案时,精读了L10-L19感觉A、B都对,很耗时的选了B。请问老师有什么好思路?

解答:

点赞0
阅读929
解答: 郭培月老师

提问:

老师,这道题我觉得A、B、E都很难排除,A和E说法比较类似,都是说企业在获得盈利之后就有可能抛弃ecoefficiency,我觉得原文确实是有这个意思的,为什么排除呢?麻烦老师解答~ (there is no guarantee that increased economic growth from ecoefficiency will come in similarly ecoefficient ways, since in today’s global markets, greater profits may be turned into investment capital that could easily be reinvested in old-style eco-inefficient industries.这句话感觉和AE都满贴近的)

解答:

点赞0
阅读942
解答: sysadmin老师

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询