还没有登录哦！
[Critical Reasoning]
试题详情
题目：
In January of last year the Moviemania chain of movie theaters started propping its popcorn in canola oil, instead of the less healthful coconut oil that it had been using until then. Now Moviemania is planning to switch back, saying that the change has hurt popcorn sales. That claim is false, however, since according to Moviemania's own sales figures, Moviemania sold 5 percent more popcorn last year than in the previous year.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument against Moviemania's claim?
选项:
A、Total sales of all refreshments at Moviemania's movie theaters increased by less than 5 percent last year.
B、Moviemania makes more money on food and beverages sold at its theaters than it does on sales of movie tickets.
C、Moviemania's customers prefer the taste of popcorn popped in coconut oil to that of popcorn popped in canola oil.
D、Total attendance at Moviemania's movie theaters was more than 20 percent higher last year than the year before.
E、The year before last, Moviemania experienced a 10 percent increase in popcorn sales over the previous year.
答案:
A
提问：
不太明白答案是怎么回答问题的？是因为总的销售增加了，所以M说他的popcorn销售受损了站不住的吗？
解答：
点赞1
阅读6451
提问：
解答：
点赞0
阅读6364
提问：
不太明白答案是怎么回答问题的？是因为总的销售增加了，所以M说他的popcorn销售受损了站不住的吗？
解答：
点赞1
阅读6452
提问：
老师，问题要求反对M这个人的claim. A 是怎么回答这个问题的？没想明白？ 谢谢
解答：
点赞0
阅读6394
提问：
上课的时候说过 像这样得出结论 判断depends的 要一头一尾都相关 而这道题目的答案里面只说到了all refreshment的销量的情况 仅仅通过这一点就可以判断相关了吗
解答：
点赞0
阅读6418
提问：
A 第一眼看决觉得所有的refreshent的销量原文没说过，超范围了啊？什么情况下这种‘超范围’的，与popcorn是包含关系的选项可以留下来？
其余无关，留下了C,至少他说的是两种油的对比，原文也说了，为什么算无关呢？
请老师再看看下面回复的那一题，为什么D是在范围之内，有交集却又不选呢?这种题能用沾边做么？
解答：
点赞0
阅读6370
提问：
原文 换油爆爆米花 销售减少 这个说法错的 因为数据显示销量上升 选项看完 只剩一个E 结果答案是A
解答：
点赞0
阅读6420
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
