还没有登录哦！
[Critical Reasoning]
试题详情
题目：
For years the beautiful Renaissance buildings in Palitito have been damaged by exhaust from the many tour buses that come to the city. There has been little parking space, so most buses have idled at the curb during each stop on their tour, and idling produces as much exhaust as driving. The city has now provided parking that accommodates a third of the tour buses, so damage to Palitito’s buildings from the buses’ exhaust will diminish significantly.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument?
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument?
选项:
A、The exhaust from Palitito’s few automobiles is not a significant threat to Palitito’s buildings.
B、Palitito’s Renaissance buildings are not threatened by pollution other than engine exhaust.
C、Tour buses typically spend less than one-quarter of the time they are in Palitito transporting passengers from one site to another.
D、More tourists come to Palitito by tour bus than by any other single means of transportation.
E、Some of the tour buses that are unable to find parking drive around Palitito while their passengers are visiting a site.
答案:
C
提问：
这道题不太会选，麻烦老师讲下过程吧。
解答：
点赞0
阅读5457
提问：
老师，我是这样想的:B选项是排除了其他可能会damage building的因素，不就是相当于加强了这道题的结论-damage会减少了吗?为什么这道题不选B呢？
解答：
点赞0
阅读5514
提问：
为什么不选E
解答：
点赞0
阅读5668
提问：
CE分不清，觉得E也完全可以啊，不能找到停车位的就会溜达，就会产生污染，有了停车位不就会减少污染吗
解答：
点赞1
阅读5482
提问：
这道题不太会选，麻烦老师讲下过程吧。
解答：
点赞0
阅读5458
提问：
剩C和E，不会判断了
解答：
点赞0
阅读5437
提问：
剩CD，开始比较。
原文说了几个事：1）bus尾气破坏建筑物 2）建立停车场减少bus idle排出的尾气
C说bus花多少时间接游客
D说游客主要是乘车来的
老管的解释是，原文围绕bus谈，所以选C。但是D从句意上面讲，也是在围绕bus谈。不知道怎么比较。
解答：
点赞1
阅读5512
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
