还没有登录哦!

[Critical Reasoning]

试题详情

题目:

One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other companies. This technique, commonly called "benchmarking," permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial practices and can provide a justification for the adoption of good practices.

Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which it is not in competition rather than against competitors EXCEPT:

选项:

A、Comparisons with competitors are most likely to focus on practices that the manager making the comparisons already employs.
B、Getting 'inside' information about the unique practices of competitors is particularly difficult.
C、Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have comparable levels of efficiency, only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors.
D、Managers are generally more receptive to new ideas that they find outside their own industry.
E、Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take advantage of the special circumstances of their products or markets.

答案:

E

提问:

这类问题的解决起来有些不知所措

解答:

点赞-1
阅读5009
解答: sysadmin

提问:

没明白这道题到底在说什么,我认为每一个选项都与题目有关,并且都说的很模糊,麻烦老师分析一下每个选项和题目的关系。

解答:

点赞0
阅读5091
解答: 金栩竹老师

提问:

为什么选e

解答:

点赞0
阅读5089
解答: 郭培月老师

提问:

错选B。问题问的benchmarking用于非竞争企业间而非用于竞争企业这个有根据的原因是啥。那我读了原文的permits那句,对应就是看企业能否从其他企业中被permit去discover better forindustry thanpractice且提供justification要不要采纳此practice。B我直接看到inside的信息在对手企业是很难获取的,所以就证明了不能permit经理去discover那个实践。E我认为是无关选项,所以直接杀了。您看我的思维漏洞在哪 谢谢!

解答:

点赞0
阅读5045
解答: 王文静老师

提问:

问题想要的是什么呢?请老师讲下思路~

解答:

点赞0
阅读5084
解答: sysadmin老师

提问:

这类问题的解决起来有些不知所措

解答:

点赞-1
阅读5010
解答: sysadmin老师

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询