还没有登录哦！
[Critical Reasoning]
试题详情
题目：
People who have spent a lot of time in contact with animals often develop animal-induced allergies, some of them quite serious. In a survey of current
employees in major zoos, about 30 percent had animal-induced allergies. Based on this sample, experts conclude that among members of the general
population who have spent a similarly large amount of time in close contact with animals, the percentage with animal-induced allergies is not 30 percent
but substantially more.
Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest grounds for the experts' conclusion?
选项:
A、A zoo employee who develops a serious animal-induced allergy is very likely to switch to some other occupation.
B、A zoo employee is more likely than a person in the general population to keep one or more animal pets at home
C、The percentage of the general population whose level of exposure to animals matches that of a zoo employee is quite small.
D、Exposure to domestic pets is, on the whole, less likely to cause animalinduced allergy than exposure to many of the animals kept in zoos.
E、Zoo employees seldom wear protective gear when they handle animals in their care.
答案:
A
提问：
A. 受严重过敏的员工会选择其他职业 无关 杀掉
B.动物园员工更有可能养宠物在家里 无关 杀掉
C.普通人接触动物的level与动物园员工接触动物level差不多的比例小 无关 杀掉
D.暴露于家庭宠物更不可能引起过敏 有关 离得有点远
E.动物园员工很少穿戴防护衣 无关 杀掉
解答：
点赞-1
阅读4639
提问：
感觉c说到了比率和文章能挂上啊，a完全没有关系感觉。说他们换职业，然后和比率小有什么关系呢？
解答：
点赞0
阅读4472
提问：
A. 受严重过敏的员工会选择其他职业 无关 杀掉
B.动物园员工更有可能养宠物在家里 无关 杀掉
C.普通人接触动物的level与动物园员工接触动物level差不多的比例小 无关 杀掉
D.暴露于家庭宠物更不可能引起过敏 有关 离得有点远
E.动物园员工很少穿戴防护衣 无关 杀掉
解答：
点赞-1
阅读4640
提问：
我选了C，但没知道为什么选A
解答：
点赞0
阅读4345
提问：
这题做了很多遍，感觉A就是不沾边……
解答：
点赞0
阅读4339
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
