还没有登录哦!

[Reading Comprehension]

试题详情

文章:

    Citing the fact that the real gross domestic product (GDP) per capita was higher in 1997 than ever before, some journalists have argued that the United States economy performed ideally in 1997. However, the real GDP is almost always higher than ever before; it falls only during recessions. One point these journalists overlooked is that in 1997, as in the twenty-four years immediately preceding it, the real GDP per capita grew nearly one-half percent a year more slowly than it had on aver-age between 1873 and 1973. Were the 1997 economy as robust as claimed, the growth rate of real GDP per capita in 1997 would have surpassed the average growth rate of real GDP percapita between 1873 and 1973 because over fifty percent of the population worked for wages in 1997 whereas only forty percent worked for wages between 1873 and 1973. If the growth rate of labor productivity (output perhour of goods and services) in 1997 had equaled its average growth rate between 1873 and 1973 of more than two percent, then, given the proportionately larger workforce that existed in 1997, real GDP per capita in 1997 would have been higher than it actually was, since output is a major factor in GDP. However, because labor productivity grew by only one percent in 1997, real GDP per capita grew more slowly in 1997 than it had on average between 1873 and 1973.

题目:

It can be inferred from the passage that which of the following is the reason that the author faults the journalists referred to in the highlighted text?

选项:

A、They believe that the real GDP per capita in 1997 was higher than the real GDP per capita had ever been before.
B、They argue that the rate at which real GDP per capita grew in 1997 was faster than the average rate at which it had grown between 1873 and 1973.
C、They overestimate the effect of labor productivity on the real GDP per capita in 1997.
D、They overestimate the amount by which real GDP per capita in 1997 surpassed real GDP per capita in earlier years.
E、They fail to consider the real GDP per capita in 1997 within an appropriate historical context.

答案:

E

提问:

排除E因为觉得E的重点不是在于journalists没有考虑到GDP的XX因素(比如增长速度) 而是在于他们没有选择一个正确的历史时期去参考,即选择前24年与1873到1973年来比较是不合适的。 而在文中重点是他们没考虑到GDP增长的速度,而没有提到时间合不合适,所以觉得无关。 B讲的内容与GDP增长速度有关,所以留了。也没看出什么大问题。

解答:

点赞0
阅读5085
解答: sysadmin

提问:

这个题可以排除A B C 但是E是怎么选出来的? 如果用结合原文的方法 E是怎么推断出来的呢?或者 老师答疑时提到的不看原文的方法 可以再讲讲对比选项是怎么选出E吗?

解答:

点赞1
阅读5027
解答: 张慧雯老师

提问:

我选的A根据文章line 6 however 后面的解释,journalists 认为经济很理想,作者提出反对说GDP比之前高是普遍现象,所以我认为journalists判断经济好的标准是GDP比之前高,选的A,为啥错

解答:

点赞0
阅读5064
解答: 郭培月老师

提问:

老师好,这个文章我读到的信息是: 1997年GDP比之前高,一些journalists认为美国经济1997年好。 反对出来:理由是GDP什么时候都比以前高。 解释反对:journalists忽视了1997年GDP增长比以前慢。 后边细节看不太懂,开始做题,其他题目都对了。这道题可以排除A higher不对,B faster不对。剩下三个做不出来了。 问题一:是不是读少了东西?如果是要怎么确定去哪儿读哪些来做题?问题二:如果没读少,要怎么判断。谢谢

解答:

点赞0
阅读4988
解答: 王文静老师

提问:

排除E因为觉得E的重点不是在于journalists没有考虑到GDP的XX因素(比如增长速度) 而是在于他们没有选择一个正确的历史时期去参考,即选择前24年与1873到1973年来比较是不合适的。 而在文中重点是他们没考虑到GDP增长的速度,而没有提到时间合不合适,所以觉得无关。 B讲的内容与GDP增长速度有关,所以留了。也没看出什么大问题。

解答:

点赞0
阅读5086
解答: sysadmin老师

提问:

我选了B,觉得它能回答问题,文中也有。是不是只要是infer的题,而选项是文中直接出现的那就肯定不是正确答案?

解答:

点赞0
阅读5032
解答: sysadmin老师

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询