还没有登录哦！
[Critical Reasoning]
试题详情
题目：
Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce crop plants that are highly resistant to insect damage. Unfortunately, the seeds themselves are quite expensive, and the plants require more fertilizer and water to grow well than normal ones. Thus, for most farmers the savings on pesticides would not compensate for the higher seed costs and the cost of additional fertilizer. However, since consumer demand for grains, fruits, and vegetables grown without the use of pesticides continues to rise, the use of genetically engineered seeds of this kind is likely to become widespread.
In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
选项:
A、The first supplies a context for the argument; the second is the argument's main conclusion.
B、The first introduces a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second is a state of affairs that the argument denies will be part of that outcome.
C、The first presents a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against that prediction.
D、The first provides evidence to support a prediction that the argument seeks to defend; the second is that prediction.
E、The first and the second each provide evidence to support the argument's main conclusion.
答案:
C
提问：
我按照英老师说的跳读的方法做题：
第二句黑体句中，前面半部分是Since引导的evidence，后半部分是结论，那这句话整体是算成论据还是结论呢？
我把第二句话视为结论，就选了A，且觉得A说得很中立，排除C的原因是第二个黑体句的后半部分是结论，所以整体视为consideration就不妥。
麻烦英老师讲解一下，谢谢！
解答：
点赞0
阅读10018
提问：
这道题我选对了C,题意理解没问题。 读不懂选项B第二句话字面意思。什么叫affaor that argument deny will be outcome
请金老师回答
解答：
点赞0
阅读9962
提问：
OG20 的635题，与这道题十分相似。除了划线部分不一样，但是答案和选项内容都一样。错选了D，希望老师讲解一下这道题。以及这两道题的差异，为什么答案就是一样的，每句话的功能不应该是不一样的嘛
解答：
点赞0
阅读10060
提问：
老师 我觉得第二个黑体句是结论 第一个黑体句是反驳结论的。ABC选项觉得都差不多啊
解答：
点赞0
阅读10001
提问：
请教老师：我个人对于选项的conclusion和argument的区别有点困惑，在bold题里总是分不清。能否劳烦老师以此题为例，提点指导我。
解答：
点赞3
阅读9995
提问：
b和c 都有相反的意义 怎样区分呢？
解答：
点赞0
阅读9978
提问：
A瞅着挺好啊。
解答：
点赞0
阅读10001
提问：
我按照英老师说的跳读的方法做题：
第二句黑体句中，前面半部分是Since引导的evidence，后半部分是结论，那这句话整体是算成论据还是结论呢？
我把第二句话视为结论，就选了A，且觉得A说得很中立，排除C的原因是第二个黑体句的后半部分是结论，所以整体视为consideration就不妥。
麻烦英老师讲解一下，谢谢！
解答：
点赞0
阅读10019
提问：
A 为什么不对呢。
解答：
点赞0
阅读9967
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
