还没有登录哦！
[Critical Reasoning]
试题详情
题目：
Charcoal from a hearth site in Colorado, 2,000 miles south of Alaska, is known to be 11,200 years old. Researchers reasoned that, since glaciers prevented human migration south from the Alaska-Siberia land bridge between 18,000 and 11,000 years ago, humans must have come to the Americas more than 18,000 years ago.
Which of the following pieces of new evidence would cast doubt on the conclusion drawn above?
选项:
A、Using new radiocarbon dating techniques, it was determined that the charcoal from the Colorado site was at least 11,400 years old.
B、Another campsite was found in New Mexico with remains dated at 16,000 years old.
C、A computer simulation of glacial activity showed that it would already have been impossible for humans to travel south overland from Alaska 18,500 years ago.
D、Using new radiocarbon dating techniques, it was proved that an ice-free corridor allowed passage south from the Alaska-Siberia land bridge at least 11,400 years ago.
E、Studies of various other hunting-gathering populations showed convincingly that, once the glaciers allowed passage, humans could have migrated from Alaska to Colorado in about 20 years.
答案:
D
提问：
感觉c和d都沾边，又仔细看了一遍题，人问的是哪个选项削弱原来的结论，就不知道怎么用沾边的标准来解题了，稍微想了两个选项的内容，觉得c更能削弱，d的at least的意思没看懂
解答：
点赞0
阅读1159
提问：
想问问王文静老师关于这个道逻辑题。这道题到底想问什么？还有是什么思路去做这个题的。
解答：
点赞0
阅读370
提问：
这道题各种都没看懂。。能否请老师把原文和五个选项都讲一下
解答：
点赞0
阅读1165
提问：
感觉c和d都沾边，又仔细看了一遍题，人问的是哪个选项削弱原来的结论，就不知道怎么用沾边的标准来解题了，稍微想了两个选项的内容，觉得c更能削弱，d的at least的意思没看懂
解答：
点赞0
阅读1160
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
