还没有登录哦！
[Critical Reasoning]
试题详情
题目：
In the two years following the unification of Germany in 1989, the number of cars owned by residents of East Germany and the total distance traveled by cars in East Germany both increased by about 40 percent. In those two years, however, the number of East German residents killed each year as car occupants in traffic accidents increased by about 300 percent.
Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the disproportionate increase in traffic fatalities?
选项:
A、The average number of passengers per car was higher in the years before unification than it was in the two years after.
B、After unification, many people who had been living in East Germany relocated to West Germany.
C、After unification, a smaller proportion of the cars being purchased by East German residents were used vehicles.
D、Drivers who had driven little or not at all before 1989 accounted for much of the increase in the total distance traveled by cars.
E、Over the same two-year period in East Germany, other road users, such as motorcyclists, bicyclists, and pedestrians, experienced only small increases in traffic fatalities.
答案:
D
提问：
逻辑，不懂 看完后觉得所有的选项都无关
解答：
点赞0
阅读4657
提问：
想请老师解释一下c选项，统一以后只有一小部分汽车是被以前开过车的东德人买的，我的思路：只有一小部分车是老司机买的——大部分买车的人没经验——容易出车祸
解答：
点赞0
阅读4683
提问：
我选的E 因为我觉得道路上其他交通工具的设施没有提高 那尽管车子的提高 也会导致交通事故啊
解答：
点赞1
阅读4649
提问：
AD两个比较，其他两个录音老师都是讲的都是说事故率增长的原因，提问明明问的就是死的人数暴增的原因。
AD里面比较感觉跟residents killed by accidents. 比较相关的是A阿。求解。
解答：
点赞0
阅读4735
提问：
逻辑，不懂 看完后觉得所有的选项都无关
解答：
点赞0
阅读4658
提问：
PREP CR
解答：
点赞0
阅读4661
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
