还没有登录哦!

[Reading Comprehension]

试题详情

文章:

    A key decision required of advertising managers is whether a "hard-sell" or "soft-sell" strategy is appropriate for a specific target market. The hard-sell approach involves the use of direct, forceful claims regarding the benefits of the advertised brand over competitors' offerings. In contrast, the soft-sell approach involves the use of advertising claims that imply superiority more subtly

    One positive aspect of the hard-sell approach is its use of very simple and straightforward product claims presented claims presented as explicit conclusions, with little room for confusion regarding the advertiser's message. However, some consumers may resent being told what to believe and some may distrust the message. Resentment and distrust often lead to counterargumentation and to boomerang effects where consumers come to believe conclusions diametrically opposed to conclusions endorsed in adverrising claims, By contrast, the risk of boomerang erects is greatly reduced with soft-sell approaches. One way to implement the soft-sell approach is to provide information that implies the main conclusions the advertiser wants the consumer to draw, but leave the conclusions themselves unstated. Because consumers are invited to make up their own minds, implicit conclusions reduce the risk of resentment ,distrust, and counter argumentation.

    Recent research on consumer memory and judgment suggests another advantage of implicit conclusions. Beliefs or conclusions that are self-generated are more accessible from memory than beliefs from conclusions provided explicitly by other individuals, and thus have a greater impact on judgment and decision making. Moreover, self-generated beliefs are often perceived as more accurate and valid than the beliefs of others, because other individuals may be perceived as less less knowledgeable, or may be perceived as manipulative or deliberately misleading. Despite these advantages, implicit conclusions may mot always be more effective than explicit Conclusions. One risk is that some consumers may fail to draw their own conclusions and thus miss the point of the message. .Inferential activity is likely only when consumers are motivated and able to engage in effortful cognitive processes. Another risk is that some conSummers may draw conclusions Other than the one intended ,Even if inferential activity is likely there is no guarantee that consumers will follow the path provided by the advertiser. Finally, a third risk is that consumers may infer the intended conclusion but question the validity of their inference.

题目:

it can be inferred from the passage that advertisers could reduce one of the risks discussed in the last paragraph if they were able to provide

选项:

A、motivation for consumers to think about the advertisement's message 
B、information that implies the advertiser's intended conclusion but leaves that conclusion unstated
C、subtle evidence that the advertised product is superior to that of competitors
D、information comparing the advertised prod uct with its competitors
E、opportunity for consumers to generate their own beliefs or conclusions

答案:

A

提问:

先说一下我读到的观点和脉络。 先说有两种广告策略,硬销售和软销售,硬销售比较直接,软销售比较含蓄 硬销售的好处,大概就是能简单直接地把想跟消费者说的说出来,不会造成误解。而也有危险,比如消费者会排斥...软销售就没有这个问题,然后讲了软销售的一些优势,最后说软销售业有不好的地方。 题目问的是文章认为如何降低风险在最后一段中说的 脑中信息没法做,就想回原文定位,题目中有两个词,一个reduce一个risk,首先想找名词,但是risk在最后一段提到好多次,就想看有没有reduce,但是没找到,就只能又回原文找risk,就把原文最后的三个risk看了,回来做题,排除了CDE,剩下AB 我看到的区别主要是A说的是广告的message,B说的是广告的结论 感觉我读到的意思是结论,于是就选了B 我不知道是不是犯了一个错误就是我从原文得答案了? 而且像这种没办法精确定位的题目就会不知道从哪下手,常常就囫囵吞枣的读了一大堆,尤其是在自然科学类文章比较难懂的时候,读完了又浪费时间,而且常常读完了也做不出题。不知道我的问题在哪呢? 请老师指教

解答:

点赞0
阅读2021
解答: sysadmin

提问:

A B 对A的理解:虽然客户会去想,但依然无法解决 may fail to draw their own conclusions (fail to我觉得并不是没有去想而是去想了但是想不出 所以光有motivation不行) 而B: intended 会解决后面想法偏差的risk

解答:

点赞0
阅读2043
解答: sysadmin老师

提问:

定位在risk上,然后扫到文章最后几句都在说risk。就把每个risk开头说这个risk是is。。。的这个句子读了。在比较之中选择了E

解答:

点赞-1
阅读1998
解答: sysadmin老师

提问:

先说一下我读到的观点和脉络。 先说有两种广告策略,硬销售和软销售,硬销售比较直接,软销售比较含蓄 硬销售的好处,大概就是能简单直接地把想跟消费者说的说出来,不会造成误解。而也有危险,比如消费者会排斥...软销售就没有这个问题,然后讲了软销售的一些优势,最后说软销售业有不好的地方。 题目问的是文章认为如何降低风险在最后一段中说的 脑中信息没法做,就想回原文定位,题目中有两个词,一个reduce一个risk,首先想找名词,但是risk在最后一段提到好多次,就想看有没有reduce,但是没找到,就只能又回原文找risk,就把原文最后的三个risk看了,回来做题,排除了CDE,剩下AB 我看到的区别主要是A说的是广告的message,B说的是广告的结论 感觉我读到的意思是结论,于是就选了B 我不知道是不是犯了一个错误就是我从原文得答案了? 而且像这种没办法精确定位的题目就会不知道从哪下手,常常就囫囵吞枣的读了一大堆,尤其是在自然科学类文章比较难懂的时候,读完了又浪费时间,而且常常读完了也做不出题。不知道我的问题在哪呢? 请老师指教

解答:

点赞0
阅读2022
解答: sysadmin老师

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询