还没有登录哦!

[Critical Reasoning]

试题详情

题目:

Which if the following, if true, most logically completes the argument?
 
Aroca County's public schools are supported primarily by taxes on property.  The county plans to eliminate the property tax and support schools with a new three percent sales tax on all retail items sold in the county.  Three percent of current retail sales is less than the amount collected through property taxes, but implementation of the plan would not necessarily reduce the amount of money going to Aroca County public schools, because ______.

选项:

A、many Aroca County residents have already left the county because of its high property taxes
B、a shopping mall likely to draw shoppers from neighboring counties is about to open in Aroca County
C、at least some Aroca County parents are likely to use the money they will save on property taxes to send their children to private schools not funded by the county
D、a significant proportion of parents of Aroca County public school students do not own their homes and consequently do not pay property taxes
E、retailers in Aroca County are not likely to absorb the sales tax by reducing the pretax price of their goods

答案:

B

提问:

看到neighboring county就头也不回的把B杀了选了D 麻烦老师讲解下

解答:

点赞0
阅读6714
解答: sysadmin

提问:

请可爱的郭培月老师回答谢谢(⁎⁍̴̛ᴗ⁍̴̛⁎) 这道题我选了D,我的思路是:大部分人没有自己的房子,不用交财产税,即使财产税率比较高,税基也没有很大,funding 的总额本来就不是很大,所以即使之后改成比较低的消费税,因为消费税每个买商品的人都要交,那么税基也大,所以解释了funding并没有减少。请问老师我这么想有什么问题吗? 另外做这道题时我看到B的时候觉得是无关选项,因为看到从临近的国家,觉得范围上就错了。知道这是正确选项之后又能明白为什么对。平时做题有时候无法每次都能准确地判断有关和无关,主要是杀剩最后两个选项的时候。请问老师您判断有关无关的时候有什么技巧吗?或者在这方面应该怎么提升呢?谢谢老师(^з^)

解答:

点赞2
阅读6733
解答: 郭培月老师

提问:

E我怎么都绕不过来。retailer不absorb的话不就是税要比absorb高吗?

解答:

点赞0
阅读6729
解答: 胡凡老师

提问:

老师您好,这题我在比的过程中觉得B明显不对,因为B推理了好几步,最后留下了C,但是答案是B,求老师解答,谢谢您!

解答:

点赞0
阅读6771
解答: sysadmin老师

提问:

B选项感觉完全跟原文连不上一上来就排除了,错选D

解答:

点赞0
阅读6708
解答: sysadmin老师

提问:

看到neighboring county就头也不回的把B杀了选了D 麻烦老师讲解下

解答:

点赞0
阅读6715
解答: sysadmin老师

提问:

b/e?

解答:

点赞0
阅读6704
解答: sysadmin老师

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询